Why Washing Chicken before Cooking Is Unsafe [Video]

Many people believe that washing raw chicken prior to cooking is safe, or even prevents food-borne illness. In fact, the opposite is true

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Rachel Ewing is a news officer for science and health at Drexel University. She contributed this article to Live Science's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights

Like most people, you may believe that washing raw chicken prior to cooking is safe, or even prevents food-borne illness. In fact, the opposite is true. 

"You should assume that if you have chicken, you have eithersalmonella or campylobacter bacteria on it, if not both," said food safety researcher Jennifer Quinlan, an associate professor at Drexel University. These two bacteria, she noted, are the leading causes of food-borne illness. "If you wash it, you're more likely to spray bacteria all over the kitchen and yourself." And the water you would use to rinse the chicken is not hot enough to kill bacteria, either.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Quinlan worked with doctoral student Shauna Henley to discover that washing raw poultry was a common unsafe practice for people in several minority groups, though a subsequent, larger survey by the same researchers showed the practice was common across the board, for all cultures. 

People are attached to the idea of washing raw poultry, Quinlan noted, for a variety of reasons. According to their focus group study, "Some think they're cleaning off germs," she said. "Some just want to get slime off, or feel like it's dirty." 

In reality, washing chicken increases the risk that harmful bacteria could spread to the sink and surrounding surfaces through a process called aerosolization. If people eat any food being prepared on those surfaces, they could become sick through the cross-contamination, And there's simply no need to wash the chicken because cooking it to a proper temperature will kill the bacteria. 

A safer way to remove slime, if desired, is to wipe gently with a paper towel and then throw the towel away. 

Learning that washing is actually a problem is an essential first step. Quinlan estimates that public readiness to stop washing chicken is "about where cooking-thermometer usage was about 15 to 20 years go." At that time, she said, "nobody owned a thermometer or thought about using one to test doneness [of cooking meat]. Now people own a thermometer, and at least some use them."

Quinlan and Henley have developed the "Don't Wash Your Chicken" campaign, featuring and photo-novellas and mini-drama videos. They chose the format of half-comic, half-illustrated stories because they are similar to those that are popular in health education materials for communities the researchers were targeting. 

New Mexico State University, the Drexel team's partners for educational media development, also had strengths in video production, so the researchers were able to produce the stories with professional actors. Each story features a person preparing chicken and attempting to wash it, until intercepted by a family member who informs them about the risk. 

Each story features a different type of chicken (such as a whole chicken or boneless chicken breasts) to convey that no raw poultry is safe for washing, and includes a healthy recipe for the featured meal. The campaign is an outgrowth of the researchers' U.S. Department of Agriculture-funded research effort to address unique food-safety risks in U.S. minority populations. Learn more and view the stories at drexel.edu/dontwashyourchicken, and see a discussion of the campaign in this video.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe