New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

World War Mentality Needed to Beat Climate Change

Winning requires “building big factories, and building them really, really fast”

Bill McKibben says the fight to limit global warming can be won with an industrial effort akin to that during World War II.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

America’s next president must declare war on climate change in the same way President Franklin Roosevelt fought the Axis powers during World War II, climate activist Bill McKibben said in an article published today in The New Republic.

McKibben argued that the next president should harness the nation’s industrial might in exactly the same way Roosevelt did in the months leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor and in the years following the U.S. entrance into the war.

“It’s not that global warming is like a world war. It is a world war. And we are losing,” wrote McKibben, an author and activist who co-founded 350.org to fight the Keystone XL pipeline project.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Defeating the Nazis required more than brave soldiers,” he wrote. “It required building big factories, and building them really, really fast.”

American scientists “have been engaged in a quiet but concerted effort to figure out how quickly existing technology can be deployed to defeat global warming,” McKibben wrote, calling it a “modest start ... for a mighty Manhattan Project.”

McKibben, who supported Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I), says the next administration need look no further than the calculations made by a team at Stanford University led by Mark Jacobson that determined how each state could by powered 100 percent by the sun, wind and water by 2050. Getting there requires about 6,448 gigawatts of clean energy to replace fossil fuels—or the equivalent of 295 solar factories the size of Elon Musk’s SolarCity Gigafactory under construction in Buffalo, N.Y.

But it’s possible, McKibben wrote, if the United States takes on a warlike approach to curtailing greenhouse gas emissions and the resulting global warming.

“Without the same urgency and foresight displayed by FDR—without immediate executive action—we will lose this war,” McKibben wrote.

Reprinted from ClimateWire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net. Click here for the original story.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe