Subscription Center
Apr 8, 2009
It's a busy time for nuclear-policy analysts: Just days after President Obama told a crowd of 20,000 in Prague that the U.S. had a “moral responsibility" to take the lead in ridding the world of nuclear weapons, two groups have come forward with their own blueprints for doing so.
A report from one group, instead of endorsing Obama’s first priority, the U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), advocates a radical rethinking of American nuclear weapons policy. The other report recommends reducing the number of warheads in the U.S. nuclear arsenal to 500, down from today’s total of around 5,000.
Both reports come just days before a Congressionally mandated Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States is scheduled to release a review of “nuclear weapons policy, strategy, and force structure.”
See what we're tweeting about
DrJudyStone Honored to be cited! RT @RachelNuwer: #FDA Sticks Its Nose Into Fecal Transplant Procedures http://t.co/GEcrY6gtD2 via @SmithsonianMag #FMT DrJudyStone Thx for kind words! RT @PeggyFund: @DrJudyStone Thanks for your great piece on the FDA stool transplant issue! DrJudyStone Incr common exp, sadly RT @FearLoathingBTX: Raise your hand if you've had an experience like this at a hospital http://t.co/vqynmWtKzr
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
