For those journalists who have been monitoring “clean coal” technology over the last few years, it was no surprise to hear that the U.S. Department of Energy has canceled its so-called FutureGen plant, which was to burn coal to produce electricity and then sock away the resulting climate change-causing carbon dioxide emissions underground. (For the news reports, just Google News: clean coal)
Although many experts believe that truly clean coal-fired power plants, coupled with carbon capture and storage systems, offer one of the best hopes of keeping global greenhouse warming at bay during the next few decades (For more information, see two SciAm articles: “What to Do about Coal"; September 2006; by David G. Hawkins, Daniel A. Lashof and Robert H. Williams; and “Can We Bury Global Warming?”; July 2005; by Robert H. Socolow), there was always a sneaking suspicion that the government wasn’t completely serious about making the large investments necessary to make the new concept really work. Environmentalists had meanwhile complained that the estimated $1.8-billion FutureGen effort was a mere payoff for the politically connected coal industry, and one heard rising rumors that the costs of the project were ballooning out of control. Now the DOE says that it will instead fund “multiple” projects aimed at commercializing integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) coal plants by 2015.
You have to wonder whether such a decentralized effort, coming on the heels of the terminated project, will really yield any useful fruit in the long run. For no matter where you stand regarding climate change, the coal industry and our future energy needs, the U.S. must soon make progress on IGCC and carbon sequestration technology to have any chance of successfully meeting the minimum international goals for atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. The DOE, the energy industry and the American people have to bite the bullet and spend what’s necessary to make it happen here and, more importantly, in the rest of the world, where coal combustion is spiking.
-- Edited by Christie Nicholson at 02/01/2008 9:13 AM
You Might Also Like
Discuss This Article
Subscription Center
Most Popular Blog Posts
9,000-year-old brew hitting the shelves this summer
AIDS vaccine surprises scientists, proves partially successful
World's leading protector of the oceans? President Bush
Wanted: Home for 17,000 tons of mercury
Is birth control the answer to environmental ills?
Editor's Pick
-
Powering a Green Planet: Sustainable Energy, Made InteractiveThe Web-only article below is a special rich-media presentation of the feature, "A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030", which appears in the November 2009 issue of Scientific American. It was created by FlypMedia.com. Use the arrow in the lower corner to navigate
Environment Newsletter
Get weekly coverage delivered to your inboxVideo
Podcasts
-
60-Second Earth
RSS ·
iTunes
Capturing Carbon Dioxide
click to enable
-
60-Second Science
RSS ·
iTunes
Babies Already Have An Accent
click to enable
Slideshows
Frozen Antarctic lakes yield new viruses
Prospects for solar: "It's like watching the Internet mature in 1995"
NASA-funded monkey-radiation experiment raises hackles
What will it take to force political action on climate change?
Google Droid is here: Can it go toe-to-toe with Apple's iPhone?
First Look at Carbon Capture and Storage in a West Virginia Coal-Fired Power Plant [Slide Show]
Don't Let the Bedbugs Bite: Pest Management Proves More Effective than Pesticides



