Jul 9, 2009 02:30 PM in Energy & Sustainability | 2 comments
Continued rumblings may mean stress in the San Andreas Fault is building for another big quake
An analysis of eight years of seismological data from deep in the central California crust shows that tremor rates along the area’s section of the San Andreas Fault have remained high for the past six years, signaling the possibility of a larger earthquake, according to a paper published today in Science.
“Tremors are a more sensitive indicator of stress change than are earthquakes,” the study authors write. And the tremor data seem to indicate that the San Andreas Fault “may have transitioned into a new state of stress and/or deformation,” bringing fears of something akin to the infamous 7.8-magnitute 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake, in which the fault ruptured significantly.
Contrary to popular belief, the tremors “are not relieving a lot of stress or making the fault less hazardous,” lead author Robert Nadeau, a seismologist at the University of California Berkeley, said in a statement. Instead, they seem to signal a change in the way stress is being distributed in sections of the fault that are “locked” (that is, they haven’t moved, indicating a build up of stress).
The researchers studied readings taken from 76 monitoring stations around Parkfield, Calif. (which is about half way between Los Angeles and San Francisco). They found 2,198 tremors that had rumbled the depths (between 10 and 20 miles—15 and 30 kilometers—below the surface, rather than the 10-mile depth of full-fledged quakes) since 2001.
Two nearby earthquakes—a 2003 6.5-magnitude in San Simeon and a 2004 6.0 in Parkfield—also helped Nadeau and co-author Aurelie Guilhem, a U.C. Berkeley graduate student, to paint a better picture of how these tremor rates changed before and after quakes. Both earthquakes saw a spike in tremors both before and after, and a few weeks before the Parkfield earthquake, tremor activity jumped 10-fold, the authors note.
“What’s surprising is that the activity has not gone down to its old level,” Nadeau said.
That the area has escaped a major quake since 1857 doesn't bode well for the region, the authors note: "This segment is now fully locked,” and the fault was predicted to have ruptured again between 1942 and 1999, putting it already 10 years overdue for the big one.
Image of San Andreas Fault in Central California courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/USGS
You Might Also Like
Discuss This Article
Subscription Center
Most Popular Blog Posts
9,000-year-old brew hitting the shelves this summer
New solar-cell efficiency record set
AIDS vaccine surprises scientists, proves partially successful
Is birth control the answer to environmental ills?
Editor's Pick
-
Adapting to the Freshwater CrisisForward-thinking experts are getting a better handle on the growing global water shortage and coming up with innovative approaches to ensuring the security, safety and sustainability of this resource
Energy & Sustainability Newsletter
Get weekly coverage delivered to your inboxPodcasts
-
60-Second Earth
RSS ·
iTunes
The Jellyfish Menace
click to enable
-
60-Second Science
RSS ·
iTunes
Plants Share Light If Neighbor Is Related
click to enable
Slideshows
Why do human testicles hang like that?
Researchers Try to Solve the Mystery of HIV Carriers Who Don't Contract AIDS
Hackers indicted for 12-hour ATM attack that netted $9 million
Fight to protect California condors from lead ammunition moves to Arizona
Circulation of LHC Beams Could Resume in Earnest over the Weekend
Measuring Up: New NIST Director, Plus Big Budget Put Measurement Science in Public Eye
How Long Can a Nuclear Reactor Last?
What to Do About Endocrine Disruptors? A Q&A with Linda Birnbaum



