Jun 23, 2009 07:00 AM in Health & Medicine | 5 comments
Could a genetic test on stool samples make colonoscopies unnecessary someday?
Let’s be honest: nobody really wants to get a colonoscopy, even if the procedure is crucial in finding nascent tumors. So, here’s hoping researchers working on less uncomfortable alternatives succeed.
One possibility comes from a group at Maastricht University Medical Center in the Netherlands , which reports in the latest Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JCNI) on a potential biomarker for colorectal cancer from cells contained in stool samples.
Headed by Manon von Engeland, the research group compared stool samples taken from subjects who had colorectal cancer with those from subjects who did not and found a significant difference in a gene called NDRG4.
In particular, the difference lies in a region of NDRG4 called the promoter, which acts as a switch to turn on the gene. In cells collected from cancer patients, the promoter was highly methylated--it had many more chemical compounds called methyl groups attached to it--compared with those from non-cancer subjects.
Methylation inhibits the promoter from activating the NDRG4 gene, which based on additional findings published in the paper, likely has a role in suppressing tumors. This difference led the scientists to conclude that high levels of NDRG4 methylation may flag colon cancer.
In an accompanying editorial for JCNI, Gad Rennert of Carmel Medical Center in Haifa , Israel , calls the findings promising, saying that the NDRG4 marker is more sensitive and specific than previously tested genetic markers. Family history plays a strong role in colorectal cancer, with many genes implicated in raising the risk, but NDRG4's role has not been previously studied.
Rennert goes on to say that a collection of biomarkers including NDRG4 may be the best approach to improving the technique’s precision. Other groups, such as the diagnostic company Exact Sciences, are working on similar stool tests, too, focusing on different biomarkers.
However, as the National Cancer Institute (NCI) points out, more testing needs to be done to determine if biomarkers can detect precancerous cells as effectively as colonoscopies. Removal of precancerous polyps is one of the best ways to avoid becoming one of 49,000 people in the U.S. who die each year from colon cancer, according to the NCI.
Image of the colonoscopy courtesy of leezsnow via IstockPhoto
Read More About: cancer, colorectal, biomarker
You Might Also Like
Discuss This Article
Subscription Center
World Changing Ideas
-
Video ContestInnovation is the key to a better future. Enter your own World Changing Ideas videos in our contest.
Most Popular Blog Posts
9,000-year-old brew hitting the shelves this summer
Manipulative meow: Cats learn to vocalize a particular sound to train their human companions
Wylie Coywolf: The coyote-wolf hybrid has made its way to the Northeast
A lizard that swims through sand
Scientists urge EPA to assess potential phthalates risks
Editor's Pick
-
Time to Ban Production of Nuclear Weapons MaterialA new global treaty that cuts off production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons could jump-start nuclear disarmament and help prevent proliferation
Health & Medicine Newsletter
Get weekly coverage delivered to your inboxVideo
Podcasts
-
60-Second Science
RSS ·
iTunes
Botoxed Face Impairs Bad Feelings
click to enable
-
60-Second Science
RSS ·
iTunes
Distracted Customers' Wait Times Fly
click to enable
Slideshows
Third-hand smoke contains carcinogens too, study says
Moving forward with electronic health records
Athlete alert: Is genetic juicing set to replace steroids?
Researchers Identify Genetic Variant Linked to Faster Biological Aging



