Nov 19, 2008 02:45 PM in Basic Science | 16 comments
Obama won't Bush-whack climate change
By David Biello
You may recall that President George W. Bush pledged to do something about climate change when campaigning for the presidency back in 2000—but reneged on that promise once in office. But it appears that President-elect Barack Obama will not follow suit, telling a gathering of governors yesterday that "few issues facing America—and the world—are more urgent than combating climate change":
Obama vowed to take steps to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and to 80 percent below that by 2050 via a cap-and-trade program (under which companies are allowed to pollute a certain amount and, if they come in under their limit, to sell credits to companies that exceed their quota). This despite fears that a price on carbon dioxide (CO2), which is emitted pretty much every time you drive a car, build a widget, or what have you, would further damage the U.S. economy, reeling from the credit crunch.
Obama argues in this Web video analogue to FDR's famed fireside chats that employing cap-and-trade to reduce greenhouse gas emissions—paired with $15 billion over the next 10 years in new money for solar, wind, "clean coal" and nuclear energy as well as biofuels and energy efficiency projects—will actually create five million new jobs "that can't be outsourced," as well as reduce expensive oil imports (and that climate change, left unchecked, will damage the economy further).
"My presidency will mark a new chapter in America's leadership on climate change that will strengthen our security and create millions of new jobs," he told the meeting of governors and regional leaders convened by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to address climate change. Obama, however, will not be attending the next international meeting on climate change in Poznan, Poland, in December, because the U.S. "only has one president at a time," he said. "Delay is no longer an option. Denial is no longer an acceptable response. The stakes are too high, the consequences too serious."
You Might Also Like
Discuss This Article
Subscription Center
Most Popular Blog Posts
9,000-year-old brew hitting the shelves this summer
New solar-cell efficiency record set
AIDS vaccine surprises scientists, proves partially successful
Is birth control the answer to environmental ills?
Editor's Pick
-
Adapting to the Freshwater CrisisForward-thinking experts are getting a better handle on the growing global water shortage and coming up with innovative approaches to ensuring the security, safety and sustainability of this resource
Basic Science Newsletter
Get weekly coverage delivered to your inboxPodcasts
-
60-Second Earth
RSS ·
iTunes
The Jellyfish Menace
click to enable
-
60-Second Science
RSS ·
iTunes
Plants Share Light If Neighbor Is Related
click to enable
Slideshows
In 2012 neutrinos melt Earth's core, and other disasters
Foreign Afflictions: Mental Disorders across Country Borders
Information in the Holographic Universe
Fight to protect California condors from lead ammunition moves to Arizona
Circulation of LHC Beams Could Resume in Earnest over the Weekend
Measuring Up: New NIST Director, Plus Big Budget Put Measurement Science in Public Eye
How Long Can a Nuclear Reactor Last?
What to Do About Endocrine Disruptors? A Q&A with Linda Birnbaum



