The dinosaurs that roamed Earth millions of years ago might not have been nearly as massive as we’ve long imagined, says a paper published today in the Zoological Society of London's Journal of Zoology.
The creatures may have weighed half as much as previously estimated. Paleontologists have leaned on a 25-year-old statistical model to calculate dinosaur body mass. But that method is “seriously flawed,” says Gary Packard, lead study author and biology professor emeritus at Colorado State University.
If he’s right, the biggest dinosaur, the Apatosaurus louisae (formerly of the Brontosaurus genus), wasn't really 42 tons (38 metric tons), but instead a slimmer 20 tons (18 metric tons).
The influential 1985 study that has been the basis for most mass estimates derived its models from measurements of large specimens of modern-day animal species—from rodents to hippos. But Packard and his colleagues claim that flawed equations and a sampling of uncharacteristically large individuals have overestimated weights ever since.
The standard method of prediction, using the statistical tool of back-transformation from logarithmic forms, estimated one elephant’s weight at 20,283 pounds (9,200 kilograms) based on the length of its femur. But the new, nonlinear regression model predicts 13,007 pounds (5,900 kilograms). The actual weight of the elephant? Thirteen thousand pounds (5,897 kilograms).
If the biggest lizards were half as massive, there would be far-reaching implications for our understanding of the animals, including a rethink of how they moved, their metabolisms and, perhaps, even their life histories.
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
You Might Also Like
-
Predatory Dinosaurs Breathed Like Birds, Study Suggests
-
Doing What Comes Unnaturally
-
T. rex Not Fleet of Foot, Study Shows
-
What ever happened to the theory of periodic mass extinctions,
which stated that major extinctions occur every 26 million
years? Is it widely accepted? And when was the last such
extinction--have there really been two of them since the
dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago?
Discuss This Article
Subscription Center
Most Popular Blog Posts
9,000-year-old brew hitting the shelves this summer
New solar-cell efficiency record set
AIDS vaccine surprises scientists, proves partially successful
Is birth control the answer to environmental ills?
Editor's Pick
-
Adapting to the Freshwater CrisisForward-thinking experts are getting a better handle on the growing global water shortage and coming up with innovative approaches to ensuring the security, safety and sustainability of this resource
Evolution Newsletter
Get weekly coverage delivered to your inboxPodcasts
-
60-Second Earth
RSS ·
iTunes
The Jellyfish Menace
click to enable
-
60-Second Science
RSS ·
iTunes
Plants Share Light If Neighbor Is Related
click to enable
Slideshows
Why do human testicles hang like that?
New DNA data solves the mystery of the Falklands wolf that puzzled Darwin
Zombie Creatures: What Happens When Animals Are Possessed by a Parasitic Puppet Master? [Slide Show]
Fight to protect California condors from lead ammunition moves to Arizona
Circulation of LHC Beams Could Resume in Earnest over the Weekend
Measuring Up: New NIST Director, Plus Big Budget Put Measurement Science in Public Eye
How Long Can a Nuclear Reactor Last?
What to Do About Endocrine Disruptors? A Q&A with Linda Birnbaum



