News Blog

Feb 24, 2009 04:50 PM in Basic Science | 9 comments

What Howard Stern has to say about Darwin

By Steve Mirsky

 
e-mail print comment

Editor's Note: This post is also appearing at the American Institute for Biological Sciences' Year of Science 2009: Celebrate Evolution. For more, see our tribute to Darwin on his 200th birthday.

February 12th, as every aardvark to zebra knows by now, marked the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin.  The day before the bicentennial, a spirited discussion of Darwin and his place in history came up on, of all places, the Howard Stern radio program, on Sirius Satellite Radio.  The two-minute conversation is of interest because it represents an average view on Darwin from people who are well-educated but haven’t necessarily paid a great deal of attention to developments in evolutionary science.  For them, a distillation of Darwin comes down to a single salient fact: we came from monkeys. 

What follows is a transcript of the discussion on the Howard Stern show, with some notes from me interspersed in brackets. Robin Quivers was in the midst of reading the news:

Stern
: Anything else, Robin?

Quivers: Yes.  Darwin is also celebrating an anniversary. They say that it’s the bicentennial of his birthday and the 150th anniversary of the publication of his revolutionary On the Origin of the Species. 

HS: Isn’t it funny how people, you know, they call Darwin a genius and stuff, that nobody figured out that we come from monkeys?  I mean, we look like monkeys.  I mean, it doesn’t seem like that big a deal that he figured that out, but yet it is a big deal. 

[In fact, certain basic aspects of evolutionary theory were so self-evident once Darwin had the genius to notice them that Darwin’s friend and defender T. H. Huxley said upon reading the Origin, “How stupid of me not to have thought of that!”  To hear Darwin historian and performer Richard Milner sing about Huxley’s reaction, go to the February 11th episode of Science Talk, the Scientific American weekly podcast.]

RQ: People are still arguing the point!

HS: Yeah, and you still got these religious nuts that think we, you know, didn’t come from monkeys.  You know, they refuse to accept science. 

[Most mainstream religious groups accept the reality of evolution.]

HS: They actually have skulls where we evolved from monkeys.

RQ: Well, even if we didn’t evolve from monkeys, if God made everything, he kept basing everything on the same model. And so the model was a monkey.

HS: We certainly didn’t come from fish, we don’t look like fish. 

[Wrong!  Not only do we come from fish, our anatomy reveals our deep connection—as Neil Shubin explains in his book Your Inner Fish.  For a short treatment, see his article “The Evolutionary Origins of Hiccups and Hernias,” in the January issue of
Scientific American.]

RQ: Yeah, well, they say everything started in the sea, though.  I don’t know how that all worked out.

HS: I think Darwin just saw the obvious.  I don’t know, I think if I had lived during those days I would have invented the theory of evolution.  I would have looked at, like, Gary [Stern show producer Gary Dell'Abate, famous for his large teeth and heavy brow],  and said, you know, you look like a monkey.

RQ: I think we come from monkeys after looking at you!

HS: That’s right.

RQ: That’s not nice.

HS: It’s not nice, but it’s true.  I could have come up with, I would have been the father, it would have been Howardism, not Darwinism. 

RQ: And you wouldn’t have given it such a nice name as "On the Origin of the Species". 

HS: Howardism.

Quivers starts to read another news story when Stern interrupts.

HS: Sarah Palin and George Bush didn’t believe in evolution.  I sent them a picture of Gary.  And then they changed, Bush…

RQ: They changed their minds?

HS: Oh yeah, now he believes in it.  [Long pause.]  I’m kidding, Gary.  You look good, believe me.  We should all look so good.  I look like a mess, too.

Howard’s right that we do look like monkeys.  We look even more like apes.  Because we are apes.  An analysis of the relationships among the apes reveals that we are firmly entrenched within the ape grouping.  We are more closely related to chimpanzees than gorillas and chimps are to each other.  So we are just another kind of ape.  The kind that can send satellites into space to broadcast radio comedy programs during which we spend a couple of minutes considering our origins, but apes nevertheless.  

Read More About: howard stern, darwin

Share
Propeller    Digg!  Reddit delicious  Fark 
Slashdot    RT @sciam What Howard Stern has to say about DarwinTwitter Review it on NewsTrust 
sharebar end

You Might Also Like


Discuss This Article


Click here to submit your comment.

VIEW:

2,573 characters remaining
 
  Email me when someone responds to this discussion.
 

risk free issuefree gift

Sciam - cover Email:
Name:
Address:
Address 2:
City:
State:  
spacer



Most Popular Blog Posts


Editor's Pick

  • Adapting to the Freshwater CrisisForward-thinking experts are getting a better handle on the growing global water shortage and coming up with innovative approaches to ensuring the security, safety and sustainability of this resource

Newsletter

Basic Science Newsletter

Get weekly coverage delivered to your inbox


 Podcasts

  • 60-Second Earth     RSS  · iTunes The Jellyfish Menace
    click to enable

    Download

  • 60-Second Science     RSS  · iTunes Plants Share Light If Neighbor Is Related
    click to enable

    Download





ADVERTISEMENT
 
 


Also on Scientific American


© 1996-2009 Scientific American Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
ADVERTISEMENT