Sep 4, 2008 07:32 PM in Evolution | 1 comments
Russia border dispute: Woolly mammoth is American, not Siberian
By Jordan Lite
What a long, strange evolutionary trip. The last of the woolly mammoths had North American, not Asian roots, new science suggests.
Many scientists thought the woolly mammoths -- relatives of the elephant -- represented one large population that spanned the Bering Land Bridge between present-day Alaska and Siberia.
Some of those mammoths crossed from Siberia into North America 200,000 years ago. Now, DNA analysis of woolly mammoth fossils shows that from 40,000 to 10,000 years ago, all of the beasts in Siberia showed North American genetic fingerprints, indicating that a cataclysmic event wiped out the species' Siberian predecessors. The findings, based on analysis of 160 remains from North America, Europe and Asia, are in today's Cell Biology.
"That we find such complete disappearance of the early Siberian groups is pretty remarkable," said Ross MacPhee, curator of vertebrate zoology at the American Museum of Natural History, who co-authored the paper. "It sounds like something really bad happened around 40,000 years ago that resulted in their collapse on that continent. It’s a strange and provocative finding."
Another author, Hendrik Poinar of McMaster University, said in a news release that the discovery suggests that woolly mammoths migrated across the Bering Land Bridge earlier than previously thought, then returned to Siberia to replace the older population.
Still unknown is how other species changed during the extinction of the Siberian woolly mammoth, MacPhee said.
"If we knew more about some of these other Ice Age species, we might know more about why these losses occurred in the first place," he said. "It's one of the biggest puzzles in extinction biology."
(Image courtesy of American Museum of Natural History/D. Finin)
Read More About: paleontology, woolly mammoth, genetics
You Might Also Like
-
Skepticism toward The Skeptical Environmentalist
-
Save the Muntjacs
-
What ever happened to the theory of periodic mass extinctions,
which stated that major extinctions occur every 26 million
years? Is it widely accepted? And when was the last such
extinction--have there really been two of them since the
dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago?
-
E.T. Molecules Explain a Mass Extinction
Discuss This Article
Subscription Center
Most Popular Blog Posts
9,000-year-old brew hitting the shelves this summer
New solar-cell efficiency record set
AIDS vaccine surprises scientists, proves partially successful
Is birth control the answer to environmental ills?
Editor's Pick
-
Adapting to the Freshwater CrisisForward-thinking experts are getting a better handle on the growing global water shortage and coming up with innovative approaches to ensuring the security, safety and sustainability of this resource
Evolution Newsletter
Get weekly coverage delivered to your inboxPodcasts
-
60-Second Earth
RSS ·
iTunes
The Jellyfish Menace
click to enable
-
60-Second Science
RSS ·
iTunes
Plants Share Light If Neighbor Is Related
click to enable
Slideshows
Why do human testicles hang like that?
Cracked Corn: Scientists Solve Maize's Genetic Maze
New DNA data solves the mystery of the Falklands wolf that puzzled Darwin
Fight to protect California condors from lead ammunition moves to Arizona
Circulation of LHC Beams Could Resume in Earnest over the Weekend
Measuring Up: New NIST Director, Plus Big Budget Put Measurement Science in Public Eye
How Long Can a Nuclear Reactor Last?
What to Do About Endocrine Disruptors? A Q&A with Linda Birnbaum



