News Blog

News Blog


After tragedy in last year's Kentucky Derby, is horse racing safer?

Eight Belles, Kentucky Derby, Triple CrownA high-profile tragedy befell horse racing a year ago when filly Eight Belles, having just finished second in the Kentucky Derby, collapsed with two broken ankles and was euthanized on the track. The horse's death at Churchill Downs, just two years after 2006 Derby winner Barbaro suffered ultimately fatal injuries in the Preakness Stakes, cast a pall over the sport's marquee event and raised a number of questions about the safety of horse racing—questions the industry says it has tried to address in the past year.

"We're doing everything possible, and that is the legacy of Eight Belles," Alex Waldrop, president and CEO of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association (NTRA), told USA Today. One major development has been a new sport-wide ban on anabolic steroids, which some fault for putting increased strain on the animals' bodies. (Eight Belles tested negative for steroids after the Derby.) The ban stemmed from the 2008 Derby and Preakness winner, Big Brown, whose trainer openly acknowledged giving the thoroughbred the steroid stanozolol. That was the same drug that Barry Bonds is alleged to have used in the book Game of Shadows, and for which fellow slugger Rafael Palmeiro tested positive.

But as the New York Times points out, horse racing is still awash in legal drugs, such as anti-inflammatories, that also may pose health problems for racehorses. Rick Arthur, the equine medical director of the California Horse Racing Board, told the paper that there is concern that such drugs can make injured horses seem healthy during pre-race examinations. "Obviously, the patients can't talk to us so if some medication is hiding or is masking some problem, it's difficult to determine," he said. The Times asked the owners of all 20 horses running in this year's Derby to provide records of which legal drugs the entrants were taking; only three obliged.

Also of concern is the safety of racing surfaces—the makeup of a surface can have a big impact on the rate of catastrophic injuries, and synthetic surfaces appear to be preferable to dirt tracks such as Churchill Downs's in that regard. Last month the NTRA announced that it was opening a Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory in Maine to investigate safer track materials and develop industry standards. One of the lab's coordinators, Mick Peterson, is a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Maine who has used radar to study track composition and even developed a biomechanical hoof for surface testing. According to a profile this week in the Boston Globe, Peterson "believes racing can take long-term control of its safety problems by embracing 'a culture of data.'"

Historically, data has not cast American horse racing in a flattering light—U.S. horses suffer 1.47 fatalities per 1,000 starts on synthetic tracks and 2.03 per 1,000 on dirt. According to the Times, England's fatality risk ranges from 0.8 to 0.9 per 1,000 starts, while that of Victoria, Australia, is just 0.44 per 1,000 starts. And this year appears to be no exception to the domestic trend: 12 horses have been put down at New York City's Aqueduct Racetrack (another dirt track) since November, the Times reports; another runner collapsed and died of a heart attack immediately following a race.

Nancy Heitzeg, a sociologist at the College of St. Catherine in Minneapolis, told the paper that in the U.S., since Eight Belles brought safety issues to the fore, there have been roughly three breakdowns a day. According to statistics cited by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, that rate is slightly above average.

Whatever protocols and safety measures are introduced, some risk to both human and horse is an inescapable part of the sport. "Just like auto racing...there is the potential for injury," trainer Todd Pletcher told USA Today. "We are never going to be completely protected."

Photo of Eight Belles in the 2008 Kentucky Derby: Banamine on Flickr

Tags: eight belles, horse racing, Triple Crown, euthanasia, Kentucky Derby, NTRA
More News Blog: Next: Could Cialis help treat some cancers that it also might make more likely? Previous: How a "smart charger" could ease the transition to electric cars

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. robert schmidt 09:05 PM 5/3/09

    unlike auto racing the horse has no choice whether or not it participates and accepts the risks...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. kmdkush 12:22 AM 10/2/10

    <a href="http://www.texashorseraces.com/states/kentucky.html">Kentucky Horse Race Tracks</a> has links to all of the biggest horse race tracks, city and state listings, and dog race parks in the nation as well as betting information for gamblers.
    <a href="http://www.texashorseraces.com/states/kentucky.html">http://www.texashorseraces.com/states/kentucky.html</a>

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

After tragedy in last year's Kentucky Derby, is horse racing safer?: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X