Subscription Center
Jan 7, 2009 07:20 PM | 4
Hey, ladies, been spending hours fretting over your beefy bottoms? Perturbed about your pear-shaped bodes no matter how many lunges you do daily? Don't be. Turns out that having a little extra cushioning around your derriere and hips—think Jennifer Lopez—may be a sign of good health.
Harvard Medical School researchers report in the journal Cell Metabolism that fat around the hips and buttocks may protect women from type 2 diabetes and other diseases by releasing certain beneficial hormones. They say that mice injected in their bellies with flab from those areas made better use of the hormone insulin in breaking down sugar in the blood (a key to preventing diabetes)—and they lost weight.
"The surprising thing was that it wasn't where the fat was located, it was the kind of fat that was the most important variable," researcher Ronald Kahn of Harvard's Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston told FOX News. "Even more surprising, it wasn't that the abdominal fat was exerting negative effects, but that subcutaneous fat was producing a good effect. I think that's an important result because not only does it say that not all fat is bad, but I think it points to a special aspect of fat where we need to do more research."
People who tend to store fat in their tummy areas (read: spare tires) have been found to be more prone to type 2 diabetes and heart disease than those with pear-shaped bodies, who store fat in their hips and backsides.
The bottom line: not all fat is bad. Happy New Year!
For more, see our in-depth report on the science of weight loss.
Montage of Jennifer Lopez and her famous body part by Manfrys via Flickr
Tags:
diabetes,
jennifer lopez,
hormones,
fat
More News Blog:
Next: "Love hormone" may also help us recognize faces
Previous: Splitting rockets: What would a military-NASA collaboration really mean?
See what we're tweeting about
BoraZ #SciAmBlogs Friday – Kirk vs. Spock, bridge failure, elephant seals, chemical intuition, predatory journals,... http://t.co/T6jmbk9NzO
sciamblogs #SciAmBlogs Friday – Kirk vs. Spock, bridge failure, elephant seals, chemical intuition, predatory journals,... http://t.co/ZQ56zXx2rC
DrJudyStone Liked the Drapetomania snark @medskep @gfry Or like new DSM5 http://t.co/rVqLYs8CSg
Deadline: Jul 30 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Seeker desires a method for producing pseudoephedrine products in such a way that it will be extremely difficult for clandestine che
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
4 Comments
Add CommentI vote yes!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisOh, that kind of bum. I thought you meant bums.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI agree with this phrase "not all fat is bad". It doesn't mean you are fat your not healthy. It depends on how we care for ourselves & how we value our health. Thanks for this post!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://feelbettercenter.com/
I think we need to do more research if what kind of fats are essential and non-essential. Thanks to this article. <a href="http://strategiclists.com"><b>Direct Mailing List</b></a>
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this