Subscription Center
Feb 14, 2009 09:30 AM | 47
CHICAGO—Fresh from adding a Grammy to his mantle Sunday, former vice president Al Gore told scientists gathered here for the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) to push administration officials and the general public for solutions to climate change.
"Scientists can no longer in good conscience accept this division between the work you do and the civilization in which you live," Gore said.
"Keep your day jobs, but get involved in the debate," he added.
In about a 45-minute speech, Gore reviewed the evidence for global warming, showing a set a slides that has evolved since An Inconvenient Truth. (A few of our Twitter followers—yes, we live—Twittered Gore's talk, so you can see the blow-by-blow here--pointed out that he had presented a lot of the slides at the recent TED conference.)
He began by noting a parallel between the mortgage crisis and global warming, saying the world has $7 trillion in subprime carbon assets that it can't get rid of.
This week, and 2009, he pointed out, was full of scientific anniversaries: Darwin's 200th birthday, the 150th anniversary of John Tyndall's finding that carbon absorbs infrared radiation (which allowed Tyndall to suggest the possibility of man-made global warming because of fossil fuel use), and Galileo's championing of Copernican heliocentrism (which Gore called the "inconvenient truth" of the time). And he invoked Lincoln, who shared Darwin's birthday, likening the struggle to solve global warming to the fight against slavery.
The coal industry, and in particular its $500-million ad campaign supporting allegedly "clean coal" technology, came in for particular condemnation. (You can see a few of the ads in a 60-Second Science blog post.) Gore likened one of the ads, a lump of coal wearing sunglasses, to Joe Camel ads that targeted children.
As he talked of millions of "climate refugees" in low-lying areas of the world, Gore pointed out that the Maldives now has a budget line "to buy a new country." He drew a link between global warming and extreme weather, from hurricanes to droughts to wildfires, showing photos of the recent blazes in Australia (and the now-famous rescued koala.)
Gore used a dramatic video of scientist Katey Walter lighting a plume of methane gas bubbling up from a frozen Alaskan lake to introduce the idea of methane as a potent greenhouse gas. Methane emissions from such lakes is thought by many scientists to be increasing as the permafrost thaws, allowing organic material trapped in the ice to be converted by the lake's bacteria into the gas.
(But Gore didn't stick only to climate change. He also revealed that he's an iPhone fan. A few minutes into his talk, he had to turn the phone off. As he did, he told the crowd: "Anyone who hasn't switched to one, you really should.")
Gore--who didn't take questions after the talk, citing his schedule--seemed optimistic about the Obama administration's appointments to the Cabinet and other senior posts. "This is a moment in our history as a nation and in the history of the world's population that is without precedent," he said. A few minutes later, he said, "We as a species need to make a decision."
Photo of Al Gore speaking at AAAS, taken from an overflow auditorium, copyright Scientific American. Follow us on Twitter as we post from AAAS.
Tags:
clean coal,
global warming,
al gore,
aaas
More News Blog:
Next: Artificial life: Was Steven Spielberg onto something in E.T.?
Previous: Tainted peanut butter co. declares bankruptcy
See what we're tweeting about
DrJudyStone Liked the Drapetomania snark @medskep @gfry Or like new DSM5 http://t.co/rVqLYs8CSg
JenLucPiquant New Details on the Unroyal End of Richard III, 'King in the Car Park' | Wired Science http://t.co/SqNDeUY6oC JenLucPiquant New Wireless Electronics Could Heal Wounds and Then Dissolve | Wired Science http://t.co/efApNe1OgQ
Deadline: Jun 29 2013
Reward: $7,000 USD
The Seeker for this Challenge desires proposals for chemical methods that could rapidly degrade a dilute aqueous solution
Deadline: Jul 30 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Seeker desires a method for producing pseudoephedrine products in such a way that it will be extremely difficult for clandestine che
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
47 Comments
Add Commenthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B05xnnVjJk
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy2zGGSf-tg
Unfortunately, Gore is against the expansion of nuclear energy which Europe and Asia now fully recognize is the best solution to stopping global warming.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMarcel F. Williams
http://newpapyrusmagazine.blogspot.com/
The UN IPCC is a political body spitting out reports that are designed to support a predetermined political agenda.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAs for Al Gore:
Gores film An Inconvenient Truth is full of lies. Not exaggerations. Not errors.
Lies!
Al Gore air brushed out the little ice age and the medieval warming periods from his graphs in AIT. We wouldn't want people knowing that the earth was two degrees celsius warmer than it is now during the medieval warming period. Somehow man survived without the use of central cooling. Gore left off the little ice age because he wouldn't want to demonstrate that the warming trend he talks about began at the end of an ice age.
He also stated that sea lever would rise by 20 feet by the end of the century. Even the UN IPCC (harldy conservative on this issue) estimates only 4 to 36 inches.
Gore also suggested that the Aral Sea has dried up because of global warming. In actuality it has been drained for the irrigation of cotton crops.
Gore claims that for the first time ever, a significant number of polar bears had drowned. First of all, they can swim around fifty miles. Secondly, the researchers at one of America's most respected think tanks the Competitive Enterprise Institute tracked down the study Gore was quoting and found that only four polar bears had drowned during severe storm conditions.
Furthermore, he quotes a quickly debunked paper suggesting there is a 100% consenus among scientists that athropogenic global warming is real. Here are a few scientists who must have missed the memo:
http://www.hootervillegazette.com/GlobalWarming.html
It is worth noting that a UK Court ruled that AIT contained many errors and should not be shown in public schools without a warning about the errors.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth
I find it interesting that Al Gore talks the talk, but doesn't walk the walk. He jets around the world in his private plane. He rides around in gas guzzling limousines, and has a compound so wasteful of energy that it needs its own power grid. His houseboat more than likely isn't that energy efficient either.
I suppose conserving energy and fighting global warming is for the little people. Let the peasants drive the small dangerous energy efficient cars, I'll drive what I want.
Al Gore was worth about $2 Million Dollars when leaving office and is worth over $100 Million now. He's laughing all the way to the global warming bank. It's a pity some are too gullible to see it. As one of my favorite SNL characters might have said "global warming has been bery bery good to him."
By the way, the flat earthers were the ones who refused to debate. "The debates over, we have a consensus." Sound familiar? If anyone is a flat earther, it's Al Gore.
Everyone who has seen An Inconvenient Truth should view The Great Global Warming Swindle in order to get a more balanced view of the true state of the science on this issue.
You may view it by visiting:
http://www.hootervillegazette.com/Videos.html
It is the first video listed.
Happy Viewing,
Dash RIPROCK III
Newsbusters is a Conservative Al Gore hate site, so it's credibility is already shot. It is amazing that all we see are comments skewering Al Gore and not about the science he speaks of. Very telling. The same old garbage from the same old people.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/oct/14/schools.film
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe rhetoric about the so called errors in his movie and the shill that sued him debunked. He was supported by skeptics supported by the George C. Marshall Institute which has been supported by Exxon.
Also, Al Gore never stated in his movie that sea levels were going to rise by 20 ft as a fact. He stated that should the Antarctic ice sheet melt it could raise sea level by 20 ft. which has been corroborated by scientists. BIG difference.
I agree. There has been too much silence from the scientific community. The shills being paid by oil and coal companies have had too much power in shaping this debate and in minimalizing the urgency of what this planet faces to assuage their own greed. We need a more vocal scientific community speaking truth to the people and to governments about this crisis. It is too important to the survival of our species to remain silent any longer.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAnd just as a side note: Mr. Gore was awarded the Chairman's Image Award at the NAACP Awards Sunday. It was not a Grammy.
Anyone that sides with Al Gore is a fool. This guy is the BIGGEST political hypocrite that ever lived. He wants everyone else to do without while he pollutes 10 times the amount of anyone else. Flies in his personal jets, rides limosines & a Huge yacht he just bought. I know there are alot of Libs on this website & I don't mean to be combative. Why will this guy not debate his points to people that think differently than he does? If he had solid facts & Really believed what he preaches, he would debate. If nothing else but to shut up the people that don't believe him, but he won't. Why not?? Most people's memories are not that good either. In the 80's he and tripper tried to censor singers from certain lyrics in their songs, but this didn't go over very well. So now he's hanging on to this & making money off of it. If he really believed what he is trying to force upon everyone else, he wouldn't pollute like he does. In a legitamate debate he would be exposed for the Fraud that he truly is. "Don't do as I do, do as I say". What a jerk.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisYou seem to confuse the message from the messenger. Would you think that owning a garment of clothing that was made in a sweat-shop renders a person incapable of criticizing sweat-shops? Would it invalidate the criticism? In the realm of science hypocrisy doesn't degrade the viability of sound scientific investigation and the issues they pertain to, only the character espousing those issues. Regardless, there may be some logic to a hypocritical carbon footprint by Gore: that his message is better served (or lose the battle, win the war).
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAl: You're an idiot opportunist!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHow's that for getting involved?
After reading these comments it's no wonder this world is going downhill. Just the same Conservative propaganda spewed everywhere any story about Al Gore is posted simply because they are upset he won't "debate" them. What whining crybabies.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5604464.ece
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisArticle regarding the Maldives and their search for a place to go as sea levels begin to rise. This is truly a serious crisis and it is affecting real people. Bitching about Al Gore isn't going to solve it. It is pathetic that people constantly drone on and on on these websites about their petty political grudges while real people suffer the effects of climate change. This isn't about siding with Al Gore, this is about siding with the only planet we have to sustain us. Get your heads out of the sand and for once look around you. Everything he spoke of is happening now, is real, and has been corroborated by a consensus of scientists around the world.
However, since it cannot be disputed or refuted, the usual suspects revert to personal attack because that is all they have. As it is, firemen and climate scientists in Australia are also calling on the government to now take serious steps regarding climate change in Australia after the tragic wildfires that took over 180 lives. Extreme drought that has plagued Australia resulting in the "death" of the Murray-Darling River basin more than likely exacerbated the huge devastation when a fire was set. It is now incumbant upon governments of the world, scientists, and citizens to take a serious look at where this planet stands regardless of what you think is causing it. We are currently at 390 PPM; 450 is the tipping point. You figure it out.
And as for Al Gore making money off of this, he started alerting people to this threat to our planet thirty years ago when there was no money to be made from it and he has given much of it back to the cause. So really, those who would dare to attack him while more than likely supporting the last administration that wasted BILLIONS on an illegal war and a culture of corporate greed that landed us in this current economic crisis have little room to talk.
Oh, and I stand corrected. He did receive a Grammy for his audio version of An Inconvenient Truth. But he did also receive the Chairman's Image Award from the NAACP this past Thursday along with Dr. Wangari Maathai.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMr. Riprock above seemed to express my opinion of Al Gore very well.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI see that our views are " Conservative propaganda", not that it worries me.
To Gore supporters- Do you acknowledge that he flies around on his earth saving trips in his own Private Jet.
That uses up a lot of Carbon , but he buys carbon credits from a firm he owns. He is a good politician , he is fooling a lot of people, but it may not be for all the time.
Incidentally Mr. Earthlover, what is the reason for not wanting to debate the issue?
Could be that his statements could be shown to be bullshit.
Mr. Riprock above seemed to express my opinion of Al Gore very well.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI see that our views are " Conservative propaganda", not that it worries me.
To Gore supporters- Do you acknowledge that he flies around on his earth saving trips in his own Private Jet.
That uses up a lot of Carbon , but he buys carbon credits from a firm he owns. He is a good politician , he is fooling a lot of people, but it may not be for all the time.
Incidentally Mr. Earthlover, what is the reason for not wanting to debate the issue?
Could be that his statements could be shown to be bullshit.
If I may be permitted a further comment , there was an interesting statement I read recently.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt was from the US Meteorological Service , warning of the drastic effects of global warming, the Arctic ocean becoming ice free, polar bears becoming extinct etc.
It was dated 1922.
I can't understand how we haven't gone extinct.
Al has the 'right' to do whatever he wants, but if he's going to force his ways on everyone else, he should at least have to 'prove' his points. So far he has not, and if he isn't willing to debate someone, then he doesn't seem credible at all.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisOh really, no one wants to debate Uncle Al about this? Where have you been? Here is just one incident of the dozens of debate challenges that Mr. Gore has declined.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://newsbusters.org/node/13662
You do know that the biggest factor that determines the Earth’s temperature is the Sun, right? So I guess Harvard, that bastion of conservatism (you know like the President) is wrong about the Sun affecting the Earth’s temperature. I have noticed that all of your posts are irrelevant to your arguments. Who cares who backed the Brit that is trying to stop Al’s movie from being taught in schools, or how the theoretical rise in the oceans will affect some small nation? This is not proof of your arguments. Try using links to information that actually supports your suppositions.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/1997/11.06/BrighteningSuni.html
I live in West Virginia where coal is destroying the state. They are destroying the land with mountain top removal, the water with mercury 2+, the air with tons of carbons and other deadly metals, and our health from breathing the polluted air - drinking the polluted water and living on the polluted land. If you want to see how destructive coal is, just visit West Virginia. West Virginia is #1 in chronic childhood diseases because of coal pollution and we are #1 in the nation in child abuse deaths because of the long term effects of coal smoke on the brain. Because of coal smoke, the children are born deformed and have IQ's of idiots. Our government is ran by these idiots and they believe with their whole being that coal is clean and will not harm anything. I pray every day that the feds will shut down the coal companies and bring the idiots who are destroying West Virginia to justice, but we have not had a president who could care less about an already dead state. I hope with all my heart that President Obama will come into West Virginia and stop all this senseless destruction.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt is the height of arrogance and ego to insist that the fleas on a dog control the dog.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAl Gore is a political buffoon, who like Rachel Carson of DDT fame, will have the blood of millions on his conscience when the global warming hysteria subsides and reasonableness returns to the debate. Respectfully, Albert
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAnybody who believes a politician is an imbecile. When a politician speaks, it's a good bet to believe the exact opposite.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisEnjoy the jump lemmings.
SCIENTISTS are making these claims and they are coming true if people would only look beyond the bubbles they live in. Al Gore is simply the messenger. It would appear however, that people who are too lazy to take responsibility for their actions will look to any excuse to get away with doing anything at all. Truth requires responsibility which is why so many detest the truth. It means they will have toget up off their fat butts and actually do something besides whine and complain.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm6hkAPxWqQ
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisKeep your heads buried in the sand. I'm sure your children and grandhchildren will thank you for it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSKrJ4akeCk
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisClimate skeptics are only part of the problem.
It is the purveyors of WAR FOR OIL that have the blood of millions on their hands, "Dr." Yeah, cough, "Dr."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGORE "Keep your day jobs, but get involved in the debate,"
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe only ones that ever claimed the debate over were those in the Al Gore camp...remember after the last IPCC report for policy makers came out. The debate in the scientific community has been ongoing and the strongest scientific arguments are coming from those that see CO2 as a minor contributor to the global climate. The human and environmental tragedies are real, money should be spent to improve those conditions, but not at the detriment of those economies that can generate the aid. And - without padding the pockets of companies like GIM (http://www.generationim.com/)... please remember that the GIM business model was conceived by Enron.
GORES biggest disservice is that he invoked science as objective proof of the story he has cobbled together. Warming fears are the worst scientific scandal in the history&When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists. - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
To read transcripts from the most recent debate in Poland please see:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2674E64F-802A-23AD-490B-BD9FAF4DCDB7
-jg
GORE "Keep your day jobs, but get involved in the debate,"
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe only ones that ever claimed the debate over were those in the Al Gore camp...remember after the last IPCC report for policy makers came out. The debate in the scientific community has been ongoing and the strongest scientific arguments are coming from those that see CO2 as a minor contributor to the global climate. The human and environmental tragedies are real, money should be spent to improve those conditions, but not at the detriment of those economies that can generate the aid. And - without padding the pockets of companies like GIM (http://www.generationim.com/)... please remember that the GIM business model was conceived by Enron.
GORES biggest disservice is that he invoked science as objective proof of the story he has cobbled together. Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
To read transcripts from the most recent debate in Poland please see:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2674E64F-802A-23AD-490B-BD9FAF4DCDB7
-jg
I am tired of listening to both political sides of this issue. I want real debate so that we can determine what is correct and what is not. If Al and his supporters will not or cannot answer reasonable criticism, then they should simply shut up. I am reserving my opinion on this "climate change" matter until I can see definitive and substantial debate. Until then, I am not buying.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThese SciAm discussion boards seem to bring out the global warming conspiracy crowd in droves. Every article that reports on climate change immediately has 20 posts from people who clearly don't understand the science and even more clearly don't care. Somehow these people think that even if they can't contribute to the discussion, if they ridicule something enough that they can sway the discourse. I really wonder about the motives of some of these people.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisObjectively, if Al Gore were wrong, a few generations down the road we still have green grass and we haven't exploited all of our resources yet. If the deniers are wrong, our descendents are paying for our mistakes. I know which side prudent thought would have me leaning and no amount of anonymous haranguing is going to sway me to ignore the evidence that is already there to see.
BTW, Gore is not a scientist so why would he be the one to debate the science? Why not take any of the experts up on the topic who are more than willing to defend their work. Methinks you don't really want to address the science and are trying to turn this into a "debate" on Gore's personality or a conflict judged by ridicule. Luckily the science continues and I hope that some of these researchers do start to speak up in the press instead of letting a vocal minority have carte blanche to sway the uneducated.
Al is right. We do need scientists from BOTH sides to debate the issue. Right now it is impossible to know which side is correct. The lefts attitude of 'I'm right, shut up' doesn't cut it.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWait, Al actually wants scientists to debate global warming! I thought scientists were considered Neanderthal if they didn't participate in the hysteria of the "settled science" of global warming - oops I mean climate change. Obviously I am in the pocket of "big oil" if I question the pseudo-science of man-made climate change - I just wish I would see one of those checks in my mailbox!!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFirst of all, why do the proponents of man-made global warming insist on calling those who question it "deniers" - talk about a non-scientific approach to dissent. I think I'll start calling the proponents "Chicken Littles". Second, you make the future look so "black-white" when it is really gray. The decision to follow the Chicken Littles of the world is loaded with negative unintended consequences. What if the technology to affordably eliminate the need for fossil fuels is 100 or 150 years away, no matter what the world spends - and in the meantime we reduce global GDP siginificantly - with the resultant deaths (starvation, disease) associated with lower GDPs. Or what if we choose "fixes" that result in more harm than good (like Ethanol, which has spiked global corn prices and caused needless starvation). Or perhaps governments throughout the world mistakenly see a climate disaster as a top priority, and thereby underfund REAL dangers like disease, terrorism, water shortages, etc.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMost importantly, when will the Chicken Littles of the world do a real world cost-benefit analysis of moving away from fossil fuels. If the world reduced its carbon footprint to 1970 levels tomorrow, the effect on the global temperature would be negligible even assuming the very suspect "climate models" are accurate, but at what cost economically?
I am wondering how many of those 7 Billion carbon credits Al Gore owns. It's no wonder he can use so many. If no one has to buy carbon offset credits will Al will be bankrupt? EM very interesting.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSorry 700billion (about, give or take a few)
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI thought that the debate was over? Why is Al Gore asking for scientists to debate again?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe Honorable Albert Gore is trying to get out a message supported by the best science available. If you believe that the Science in his presentation is false, then address it point by point and post it for peer review. Verbal debating would be a waste of Mr. Gore's time.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisJames W. Owen
A Believer
The Honorable Albert Gore is trying to get out a message supported by the best science available. If you believe that the Science in his presentation is false, then address it point by point and post it for peer review. Verbal debating would be a waste of Mr. Gore's time.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisJames W. Owen
A Believer
james w. the facts are, ice cores show co2 levels increase after temperature increase, not before. the present warm period is not as warm as long as the last. solar total output changes over many cyclic timings yielding warming in cool periods and cooling in warm. cold periods in cool and hot in warm. we were in a hot in a warm in a cooling period. we are now in a cooling in a warm in a cooling period. we will soon be in a warming of cooling in a cooling period. so that in 2 more years you will be able to point again to rising temperatures for 3 years and then the trend will be more consistatly down. this warm period(240 years) is as warm but shorter then the last ( 300years). instead of aquireing an opinion from sensationalism you should personally study all of the facts for your self and then make up your own mind. I may be a dumb old farmer but I have been studying all of the facts that effect weather and climate for a very long time and I would need a large book to explain all of the factors.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWait a minute! I thought Al said there was no debate!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisearthlover: I have a proposition for you. Al Gore has stated that earth's north polar ice cap will be gone in five years (about 4 1/2 years as of today). If Al Gore is correct, I will publicly state that he and not president Obama is the Messiah. If Al Gore is incorrect, will you publicly state that he is a political buffoon? Respectfully, Gortenbull
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThere is an inventor from Wisconsin who invented an all-electric car in the form of a Ford Ranger that was shown at the KARE 11 fair booth at the 2008 Minnesota State Fair.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt is capable of reaching 100 miles per hour in speed, has a range of 300 miles, charges in 10 minutes and is pollution free with only the pollution that is done to make the electricity to charge it.
The inventor of this invention has, to my understanding, approached Ford Motor Company with his invention. The Ford Motor Company, in my estimation, should latch onto this idea, pronto.
My understanding is there are members of Congress who are trying to shoot down this idea of an electric car.
Where is there any common sense in this country?
There is a solution now for co�/globel warming/drinkingwater/
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thiswww.keshetechnologies.com there you find the answer for this globel problem and it is not theory it is actuel working .
This is what everybody is looking forword to .
Greenpeace is already been contakt an many people .
I find it disturbing nobody is even paying attention to keshe technologies
MR Keshe has discoverd Gravety and if any body any where else would achived this .
It would be a breaktrough right??,
Why is this kept silent?????,
C De Roose
solution co² not for tomorow but now energy /medical
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHallo ,
I sent this mesage, look into this technologie www.keshetechnologies.com
This keshetechnologie has discoverd that from now on ,people are able to travel with gravety on board of a space vessel .
So people can live in space like on planet earth, and all the conditions we need as human beings .
This is not for in 10 or 50 years but availble NOW and everybody is sweeping it under the table.
Eveybody went to see the movi OF AL GORE,and everybody is aware that the co² and globel warming is a big problem .
There is a new technologie that has a working proof that it can clean up co² and in return produce drinking water,another big problem for a part of the world where drinking water is a matter of life and dead.
The reality is: this technologie is here, and also for a lot of medical problems there are solutions where the classiek medicin has no solution for now. www.keshetechnologies.com/medical.html
people have told there own story how this technologie made them healty again.
Alzheimer,parkinson,prematuur born baby s ,mld,ms ,cvs,and so many more .
There are no hostpitals and dokters in space and pharma industry and we can not take all this into space.
So people have to be able to keep themself healty or cure themselfs in a simple way.
If any where in the world somebody find the solution for gravety, it wil go publiek right?? and now thy stay silent?
My contact is 0032 478493628 in Belgium c.deroose@keshtechnologies.com
Many thanks
C De Roose
There is a way around this globel warming go and type on google keshe and go to keshetechnologies you find the right answer to sort globel warming.And also for co² problem.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisYou want to have some nuws from neuw people go on google and type keshe go to keshetechnologies and than you find the new way how or planet can be saved
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGlobel warming can be sorted and now not in 30 years
We have to make it right for or children now.
C De Roose
Al: there's another way to sell "green". We believe Biophilic Design offers compelling reasons to invest in green for the return on investment (ROI) now. For example, a green roofed loft complex in Kansas City enjoys a 90% occupancy in a 73% market. This way everone is a winner! Check out our website often as it is under development. www.biofilic.com
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this