Subscription Center
Sep 29, 2008 01:29 PM | 1
The results of the first auction of global warming pollution in U.S. history are in: power plant owners are willing to pay just over $3 for every ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) they emit. More than 12 million allowances were sold for $3.07 last Thursday, bringing in $38 million for the renewable energy and energy efficiency programs of the six Northeastern states involved.
A second auction on December 17 will bring all 10 states into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (affectionately known as RGGI or "Reggie.") But already the 59 bidders in the auction—primarily energy companies but also financial speculators and environmentalists—were willing to buy four times more allowances than were actually on offer; bids came in for a total of 51,761,000 of allowances all told. (An allowance is a permit from the various state governments to emit one ton of carbon dioxide from a power plant.)
That's good news for efforts to combat climate change (and perhaps even for the economy) though it remains to be seen how well RGGI will do at bringing down emissions in the region: the cap at present is 188 million tons of CO2 per year while actual emissions were just 164 million tons last year—leaving power plant owners with room to grow their globe-warming pollution. But, since climate change is a global problem, perhaps the best thing RGGI can do is serve as a trial run for a national cap-and-trade program or carbon tax.
Credit: © Andrey Prokhorov/istockphoto.com
Tags:
climate change,
rggi,
cap and trade,
co2,
carbon dioxide,
global warming,
greenhouse gas
More News Blog:
Next: Private rocket achieves orbit, paving the way for cheaper citizen space travel
Previous: Rocket man: How did a jet pack take Yves Rossy across the English Channel?
See what we're tweeting about
FlyingTrilobite I mark favorites on Twitter the way I give a short acknowledgement nod during live conversation. "Yep."
dbiello you know what's annoying? waiting...
BoraZ Previous studies have shown… http://t.co/Z5YGPqF6vw applies to journalism as well - links, please!
Deadline: Jun 29 2013
Reward: $7,000 USD
The Seeker for this Challenge desires proposals for chemical methods that could rapidly degrade a dilute aqueous solution
Deadline: Jul 30 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Seeker desires a method for producing pseudoephedrine products in such a way that it will be extremely difficult for clandestine che
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
1 Comments
Add CommentWe have been publishing the fact that we have used CO2 (soot) and Nitriogen to make a solar cell in these Scientic American blogs and else where.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhat is possible is to use the gases that come out of coal burning stacks to make solar panels. These gases CO2, Nitrogen and Sulfur could be vapor deposted onto conductive flat plate glass in a continious process. Thus creating solar panels cheaply.
This could be the answer to these gas problems plus a cheap way to make solar panels.
Do any readers have a scientific background? Perhaps what we are printiong here is not understood.
No one has demonstrated any interest. We are gioving this away. We do not want anything for this process.