Subscription Center
Jul 29, 2009 08:00 AM | 3
After four years of debate, an international team of scientists from 25 institutions has agreed to a good—but not great—standard plant DNA bar code.
This metaphorical bar code—a short sequence of DNA unique to every species—could pave the way for a handheld plant “scanner” that could be used to quickly identify species intercepted from illegal logging operations or to identify potentially toxic plants in an emergency situation. It will also make the day-to-day work of identifying and studying new species a whole lot easier.
Scientists who study animals have long used the mitochondrial gene CO1 to build a DNA library of 60,000 species. But getting botanists to agree on a single standard has been challenging because of the genetic diversity of plants. Many research groups moved ahead with large-scale projects using their preferred gene or gene combination before a consensus had been reached.
“It’s a very contentious issue,” Kenneth Cameron of the University of Wisconsin–Madison told Nature in 2008, “There are a lot of politics and personalities involved.”
But this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cameron and the rest of the Consortium for the Barcode of Life Plant Working Group, recommended using two genes, rbcL and matK as the most “pragmatic” option. The gene matK alone had previously been shown to classify 90 percent of plant species in one study, but it doesn’t work well in every plant group, so the scientists tacked on the second gene which is more of a jack-of-all-trades.
In a test run, the scientists say the standard bar code can only discriminate 72 percent of species across the plant world, with the remainder being properly assigned to closely related species groups.
“There is little doubt that the approaches used in plant DNA bar coding will be refined in the future,” the authors write, but “the key foundation step for plant bar coding is in reaching agreement on a standard set of [genes] to enable large-scale sequencing and the development of a global plant bar coding infrastructure.”
Image of barcode courtesy Carsten Brix via Flickr
More News Blog: Next: Yawn: A new cue for drowsy driver warning systems Previous: Measuring emotion in cyberspace: Jackson's death a sad day; Obama's election a very happy one : )
See what we're tweeting about
notscientific Critical Science Writing: A Checklist for the Life Sciences. By @jalees_rehman http://t.co/vHPxUY4nkx #scilogs notscientific @kahoakes @AkshatRathi @aidanhorner Let's hope he doesn't!! :P
kahoakes @notscientific @AkshatRathi @aidanhorner If Tim Berners-Lee said we had to call the WWW "W3" would you?
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
3 Comments
Add Commentcareful what you grow!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI really bothers me when, my garlic smelling like sandalwood soap.
Pls. be careful what you grow!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI hate when my garlic smells like sandalwood soap.
Plant Bar Coding although seems good ,it is practically impossible to bar code all plants.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this