News Blog

News Blog


Breathe easy? Green inhalers are good for the environment, but are they good for asthma sufferers?

Good news and bad news for asthma patients who use inhalers: You won't be expelling Earth-warming chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) into the atmosphere  with every puff, but you will pay six times as much for your green medical device.

Until now, inhalers have been powered by CFCs, which destroy the ozone layer. On Dec. 31, all albuterol inhalers will be propelled by hydrofluoroalkane (HFA), which is better for the environment, the Associated Press reports. But it will cost you: $30 to $60, compared  with $5 to $10 now.

Albuterol is used on an emergency basis to open the airways of asthma patients suffering from severe wheezing. They take other, daily meds to control their asthma.

There are three green albuterol inhalers: GlaxoSmithKline's Ventolin HFA, Schering Plough's Proventil HFA and Teva Specialty Pharmaceuticals' ProAir HFA. Another, Sepracor's Xopenex HFA, contains a similar medication called levalbuterol.

Critics have questioned the need for the change, arguing that the steeper cost will hurt the disproportionately poor patients who need inhalers and that they are harder to use than the old kind. Users feel a softer puff, rather than the cold blast of the CFC-powered inhalers, and they need to cleaned (but not soaked) weekly to prevent clogging according to the AP.

"There's still significant confusion," pediatric allergist Harvey Leo of the University of Michigan's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital told the AP. "Patients will tell you, 'I don't feel the puff anymore."'

Image by iStockphoto/RMAX

Tags: asthma, albuterol, climate change, CFC, global warming
More News Blog: Next: Mars Science Laboratory rover delayed two-plus years Previous: Cleveland Clinic to reveal docs with lucrative drug company ties

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. rsf0000001 07:32 AM 12/4/08

    Who cares if you can't afford your inhaler, at least you won't be releasing that .01 gram of cfc every time you need to breathe.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ajc01 08:59 AM 12/4/08

    That's right; who cares if someone having an asthma attack can't breathe because they no longer can afford their inhaler. Do you even know what you're saying? Try caring about an insignificant amount of cfc while feeling like your lungs are collapsing.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. rsf0000001 in reply to ajc01 02:11 PM 12/4/08

    My previous post was sarcastic. I have asthma and I honestly don't believe that the minuscule amount of CFC from an inhaler makes any difference in the atmosphere. This is just an example of common sense going out the window because some environmentalists got involved.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. ckell 06:34 AM 12/8/08

    I think the deal is this: The CFCs themselves are not good to breathe in, particularly for us asthmatics. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are a class of man-made chemicals known by such tradenames as "Freon," "Genetron," and "Isotron." CFCs have been used in a wide variety of manufacturing steps and products including as a solvent in the electronics industry, foaming or blowing agent, aerosol propellant, fire extinguisher agent, dry cleaning solvent, degreasing agent, a key component in making rigid foam insulation for houses and household appliances, and foam packaging insulation material (known by the trade name of "Styrofoam"). Use of CFCs has declined as concern over their interaction with the environment has grown. Inhalation of high concentrations affects the nervous and respiratory system. Initial symptoms include a reduced ability to concentrate, dizziness, headaches, and bronchial constriction, which may lead to sudden death. Intentionally inhaling CFCs from aerosol cans has resulted in the deaths of several teenagers.

    So they're taking out the CFCs from inhalers because for years their potential bad effect on us has been outweighed by their utility as a solvent and a propellant in these meds, but now there's enough push to get them replaced with a preparation that doesn't need it.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Xy 07:39 PM 12/10/08

    We've been using CFC free inhalers for at least five years in Canada, with no problems. They take a bit of getting used to though... The taste is different, and the spray is not as forceful... but they work just as well. A word of caution, the ProAir and Proventil both contain alcohol as an ingredient, but that keeps the albuterol in solution better.
    A study presented at the AAAAI meeting last spring showed that inhalers leak about 5% of their contents every 28 days when carried in a purse or pocket. Walmart Canada Pharmacy sells a clip called an MDITriggerGuard that stops the leaking.
    I read you guys pay about $50 for an inhaler. We pay less than $20... Somethings wrong there :-)
    Anyway, its good to get rid of any pollutant thats messing with the ozone.
    PS don't get the new inhalers wet, it plugs up the valve and wrecks it.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Arthur Abramson in reply to ckell 10:07 AM 1/20/09

    With all due respect, ckell, you have NO IDEA of what you are blathering about. CFC-11,12 in MDIs are MUCH saver than HFA-134a, and CFC MDIs are MUCH safer than than HFA MDIs. We have plenty of clinical data and FDA MedWatch data on our site to support this. CFC MDIs were NOT banned because of medical problems- they were banned to 'restore the ozone layer', even though there is NO PROOF- ZIP, ZERO, NADA- that the trivial amount of CFC MDI emissions do any harm whatsoever.

    To get the FACTS, go to:

    www.savecfcinhalers.org

    Arthur Abramson
    The National Campaign to Save CFC Asthma Inhalers


    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Breathe easy? Green inhalers are good for the environment, but are they good for asthma sufferers?: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X