News Blog

News Blog


Can a simple checklist prevent surgical errors?

A new study has found that hospitals could cut surgery complications by about 30 percent and resulting deaths by 40 percent if doctors and nurses follow a checklist of safety rules before, during and after performing surgery.

The checklist, issued by the World Health Organization last year in response to soaring reports of hospital errors, lists 19 steps that surgical teams should follow, starting with making sure that the right patient is on the operating table, the site of incision has been located, and that the proper procedure is about to be performed. "In this era of highly intense and sophisticated technology, sometimes a very simple technology, which only takes a few minutes, can have a very positive impact," says Richard Reznick, head of surgery at the University of Toronto in Canada and co-author of the study published today in the New England Journal of Medicine.

He and fellow researchers collected data on surgery complications and deaths of 7,688 surgical patients at eight hospitals in Seattle, Toronto, London, Auckland, Ifakara, (Tanzania), Manila (Philippines), New Delhi (India), and Amman (Jordan).  These hospitals did not initially require use of the WHO safety checklist but adopted it during the course of the study. The goal of the research was to find out how implementing the checklist impacted the number of surgery complications and deaths. Of the 3,733 patients who had surgeries before the checklists went into use, 411 (11 percent) suffered complications (such as pneumonia and skin infections) and 56 (1.5 percent) of them died; of the 3,955 patients who were operated on after the hospitals adopted the WHO guide, 277 (7 percent) suffered complications and 32 (0.8 percent) died.

This study "is an attempt to make this an international standard," says Reznick, noting that the majority of hospitals around the world do not use the guidelines. But he cautions that this is just one way to prevent unnecessary complications and deaths. He says hospitals should also, among other things, mandate infection control programs to prevent post-surgery infections.

Some 234 million major surgeries are performed around the world annually, roughly one operation for every 25 people, according to WHO. The international aid agency estimates that approximately half of all surgical complications are preventable.

"Attention to patient safety will pay dividends, in terms of lessening complications and saving lives," Reznick says. "[The idea is to] try to enact things globally."

Image credit ©iStockphoto.com/Jacob Wackerhausen

Tags: surgical, checklist, complications, deaths
More News Blog: Next: Salmonella outbreak may have claimed two more lives Previous: After VapoRub warning, what about BabyRub?

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Jillipepper 08:05 PM 1/14/09

    Having worked in the medical field for 25 years, I can say that when new plans like this come up they are well followed but with time and an overworked medical system eventually it won't be followed. Bit by bit steps will be skipped UNLESS there is a person who watches the whole procedure and checks off each step as they go but has no other responsibilities during the surgery. Hopefully they will take things like this into consideration when implementing such programs.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. tknapp5 12:06 AM 1/15/09

    I've read the entire article. There was no control group (as the authors acknowledge), so the results are really not properly interpretible, and causality cannot be claimed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. ChrisJones 12:20 PM 1/15/09

    Does this mean that they, for some dumb ass reason... pride, arrogance, whatever... DO NOT already follow checklists? How moron-simple is this answer? ANY process that requires that numerous specific things happen in a certain order, from flying airplanes to building birdhouses to many surgical procedures, benefit from the use of checklists.

    This one gets four and a half "Duhs."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Can a simple checklist prevent surgical errors? : Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X