Subscription Center
Jun 25, 2009 02:01 PM | 3
Just when you thought you’d heard it all about the effects of greenhouse gases, researchers have found that higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels could lead to changes in fish anatomy involved in navigation.
A study of white sea bass eggs and larvae showed that the developing fish grew larger ear bones (otoliths, which don't field sound, but rather help fish sense speed and direction) under higher CO2 concentrations. The results appear in the latest issue of Science.
The researchers raised the fish at different CO2 saturations and then examined their otoliths under scanning electron microscopes. The find may spell trouble for fish down the road. It also highlights the unpredictable nature of biological changes in CO2-rich waters, as they had expected the ear bones to shrink rather than grow.
Ocean acidification, driven by rising CO2 in the atmosphere, is occurring faster than had previously been predicted. The change in seawater is retarding coral growth and corroding shells. But as the study authors note, "The specific effects of elevated CO2, not simply acidification, should be considered."
Although the researchers still don't know what effect the overgrown otoliths will have on the fish, "fish have evolved to have their bodies the way they are," David Checkley, lead study author and professor at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, said in a statement. "The assumption is that if you tweak them in a certain way, it's going to change the dynamics of how the otolith helps the fish stay upright, navigate and survive."
Image of 3- to 4- month-old juvenile white sea bass courtesy of Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute
Tags:
acidification,
fish
More News Blog:
Next: Gene sleuths search for clues to tamoxifen resistance
Previous: NASA climate researcher Hansen arrested at coal-mining protest
See what we're tweeting about
philipyam Just awful RT @jmtsn: Helicopter footage of Moore OK tornado aftermath is horrifying. Multiple schools destroyed http://t.co/xNyxVIgiwv
mdichristina "a lot of science..tells us they're not basing it on real scientific facts“ Congress #climate deniers HT @BarackObama http://t.co/Wo86stfDVN
BoraZ RT @aecesaro: "Is NASA Mars Obsessed?" http://t.co/ne5w2re74a Awesome infographic from @sciam's pinterest account!
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Jun 29 2013
Reward: $7,000 USD
The Seeker for this Challenge desires proposals for chemical methods that could rapidly degrade a dilute aqueous solution
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
3 Comments
Add CommentGood grief... If we spent as much time researching the potential benefits of a slightly higher CO2 concentration in our atmosphere, we may just choose global warming.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt may not be a problem, and it may even be desirable. http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/happer_testimony.pdf
blah11235813:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWe evolved to survive in a very narrowly varying environment. Theory may predict a better life under slightly differing conditions. The reality could be a nightmare.
Be happy and make the most of what you have, seek more knowledge and understanding. Those around you in financial dire straits believed they would be a lot better off if their money concentrations were a little higher.
Oh my God - larger ear bones in fish! This changes my whole attitude toward global warming. I was OK with the melting poles, more hurricanes, more disease, pestulence and famine. But now this!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this