News Blog

News Blog


Colonoscopy: Not so great after all?

For about a decade, public health officials have been aggressively pushing colonoscopy, a procedure that inspects the colon for growths using a tube and camera, as the gold standard for detecting tumors while they're still treatable. But controversial new research indicates that the method only reduces deaths from tumors closer to the rectum, where they are more common and easily visible.

Colonoscopy cut deaths from tumors in the large intestine, or left side, by 67 percent, but made no difference for people whose cancers were on the right, deeper inside the colon, according to a new study published online today in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

The researchers St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto compared the claims records of more than 10,000 Canadians who died of the disease with those of 51,000 who did not. They speculate that imperfect screening by surgeons and internists, who aren’t as skilled as gastroenterologists at performing the procedure, and differences in the appearance of tumors on the left and right sides, may be to blame.

And because the right side is closer to the start of the digestive system, it may not be as thoroughly cleansed when doctors perform the colonoscopy, says Jack Soterakis, VP of medical affairs and a gastroenterologist at St. Francis Hospital in Roslyn, N.Y. Patients may not finish drinking the special cocktail required to flush their colon of waste, potentially obscuring tumors farther up, and tumors on the right may be more aggressive than those on the left, he says.

Previous research has inferred that colonoscopy reduces deaths from colon cancer by an estimated 76 to 90 percent. Unlike earlier detection methods such as sigmoidoscopy, which checks the lower left colon, and barium enema, in which liquid barium sulfate illuminates the large intestine on X-ray, colonoscopy can reach the right section.

But some doctors are skeptical of the finding, noting that the study doesn’t distinguish between colonoscopies performed for diagnostic purposes versus prevention. People who undergo colonoscopy to diagnose symptoms of colon cancer such as visible bleeding and bloating are more likely to have cancer than people who are just getting a preventive screen, says Thomas Weber, professor of surgery and molecular genetics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, N.Y. Unlike unexplained anemia, which can be a sign of cancer in the right half of the colon, bleeding and bloating are more indicative of cancers in the left half, which make up roughly 55 to 60 percent of tumors, says Bob Smith, the American Cancer Society's director of cancer screening. (The remainder are on the right, and are becoming more common, he says.)

"It’s a surprising finding because one of the reasons that the colon cancer-prevention community has promoted this is because there is access to right side of the colon," Weber tells us. "It would be very unfortunate to throw the baby out with the bathwater on this one."

Colon cancer is the third most common tumor in the U.S., with 108,000 cases diagnosed and 41,000 deaths this year, according to the American Cancer Society. Just 40 percent of adults have gotten a colonoscopy in the last 10 years, Smith tells us.

(Updated at 3 p.m. Dec. 16 to correct anatomical descriptions.)

Image © iStockphoto/Sebastian Kaulitzki

Tags: colonoscopy, cancer
More News Blog: Next: Hackers help loggers illegally strip trees from the Amazon Previous: Readers' choice: Your 10 favorite stories from 2008

5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Neil 04:19 AM 12/16/08

    Paragraph ending "small intestine" should read "ascending colon" or "up to the small intestine".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. splashy 06:12 AM 12/16/08

    At least in this version of the article they explain what is the "left side" and "right side." It also tells us that doing the full regimen of flushing out the organ is essential.

    This is very good at giving us the facts. Thank you.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jakal 12:32 PM 12/16/08

    The author is confused regarding the anatomy of the intestine. The large intestine is not the left side and the small intestine the right side. The large intestine has both a right and left side ( also middle and sigmoid portions). It is easier to navigate the rectum, sigmoid, and left colon as discussed in the annals article.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. ZenaV 09:32 PM 12/17/08

    You're gonna think I'm a stinker, but I've always wondered about people who died with a A-hole disease....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. nosomething 10:06 PM 12/17/08

    I get a sigmoid at five year intervals. Four year ago I read in the LA Times
    that the instrument inserted in your intestines has a part that cannot be
    cleaned 100%. The writer of the article stated that the danger from that was
    minimal compared to the threat of aids. SciAm, could you do some research
    and find out if these devices they use on us are now more able to be cleaned
    thoroughly? I have the exam, but feel squemish. Thank you.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Colonoscopy: Not so great after all?: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X