Subscription Center
Sep 8, 2008 06:05 PM | 3
More evidence today that our genes aren't always our destiny — with an inconvenient caveat for couch potatoes: Physically active people who carry gene mutations linked to obesity are no more likely to be overweight than those without the variants — as long as they exercise at least three hours a day.
Scientists monitored the physical activity of 704 Amish men and women for a week with accelerometers, devices worn on the hip that keep tabs on movement. Those who carried two copies of the FTO gene variant, which previously has been shown to increase the risk of obesity, had a 27 percent risk of being fat, compared to a 16 percent risk among those who had no mutations on the gene. But heavy labor such as brisk walking, house-cleaning and gardening canceled out the gene's weight-gaining effect.
The findings are published in today's Archives of Internal Medicine.
"It's likely that physical activity will blunt the effect of this gene as well as other genes," said study co-author Soren Snitker, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore. The FTO gene, he added, originally may not have had any association with weight, especially when most of us lived the physically active lifestyle of today's Amish farmers. But the gene's "obese-ogenic" effect may be turned on by high-fat diets, inactivity or other environmental factors, Snitker said.
(Among the general U.S. population, the risk of obesity is 20 percent for those without FTO variants. It's 26 percent among people with one variant, and 31 percent in those who carry two, Snitker said. Among the Amish, who scientists studied because of their similar genetics and lifestyle, carrying one FTO variant added an extra 3.9 pounds; having two tacked on 7.7 pounds.)
But there's also an opposite effect for people without the variants, Snitker said — one you've probably observed among the effortlessly slender.
"If they're inactive, they don’t become much heavier," Snitker said. "They just have to look at an exercise bike and the pounds start falling off — they're slim already."
A separate study in the journal Acta Paediatrica found that babies with the highest levels of pesticides in their umbilical cords were twice as likely to be obese as other children, the British Independent is reporting.
(Image from iStockphoto)
Tags:
gene,
exercise,
FTO,
fat,
obesity,
overweight,
variant
More News Blog:
Next: Doomsday: Not As Much Fun As You'd Think
Previous: Study: Once-a-week diabetes drug works better than twice-daily injection
See what we're tweeting about
notscientific What's the cleanest room in town? It's in the lab. By @I_EVA1 http://t.co/yHTLn8bCsM #scilogs
johnrplatt People, seriously, stop trying to ride or jump on manatees! http://t.co/LzsgHf7aX0
Myrmecos A Brief History of Mental Illness In Art http://t.co/LCLnaumQnc via @sciam
Deadline: Aug 31 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Geoffrey Beene Foundation Alzheimer’s Initiative (GBFAI) is launching the 2013 Geoffrey Beene Global NeuroDiscovery Challenge whose
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
3 Comments
Add CommentThis is very interesting. Recently I've been hearing discussions about adding extra cost to health insurance of obese people, as well as smokers. One doctor commented that he agreed with penalizing smokers because smoking is a choice, but he disagreed with penalizing obese people because it was not a choice, that everone wants to lose weight. This research seems to dis-prove the doctor's idea.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThen there are those of us who live on perpetual diets of one sort or another and exercise hours every day and still don't lose weight. Not that it is not an effort, but it just doesn't happen for various reasons...so how can you charge a person if it is caused through a health issue or (like mine) a perscription that is causing the weight gain? Many medications have that side effect. If they can fix that first I would agree to a health tax, so to speak all the way, but until then that isn't even a fair consideration.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI find it so infuriating that scientists continue to waste time and resources searching for genetic explanations for obesity. Given that we know very well and in detail how function the physiological, hormonal and biochemical mechanisms that regulate fat storage (lipogenesis) and fat burning (lipolysis), such research looking for causes and roots of obesity in genetics are at best ridiculous, and at worse dangerously misleading. The authors should look at Ron Rosedale's work (www.drrosedale.com), and read Gary Taubes's books Why We Get Fat and Good Calories, Bad Calories (http://garytaubes.com).
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this