News Blog

News Blog


God on the brain? Scientists map religious thoughts with scans

Jesus has been "found" in tree bark, windows and even Cheetos, but now researchers have been able to map where he—or at least religion—pops up in the brain.

Scientists report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA this week that they pinpointed where in the brain different types of religious thoughts originate. According to the study, religious musings occur in a variety of regions, confirming previous research showing there is no single "God Spot" in the brain from whence all spiritual thoughts emerge.

Study co-author Jordan Grafman, a neuroscientist at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health, says that recalling a religious experience activates the same brain areas as more mundane musings, such as remembering, say, what you ate for lunch yesterday. And pondering God? Pretty much the same brain patterns as thinking about people you've never met such as historical figures or movie stars.

Grafman and his colleagues scanned the brains of 40 subjects (who described themselves as religious) while they were asked if they agreed with certain statements such as whether "God is forgiving" or "God is wrathful." Their findings: the thoughts activated areas such as the prefrontal cortex (involved in planning, social behavior and personality) and temporoparietal junction (believed to be involved in distinguishing between one's own and others desires and intentions) that are more advanced in humans than in other animals. Other primates have these brain structures, but it's still up for debate whether they have a similarly functioning temporoparietal junction, says Kalanit Grill-Spector, an assistant professor of neuroscience at Stanford University. The discovery supports the thinking that a cohesive notion of religion is unique to humans and that even our early ancestors were capable of such beliefs, Grafman says.

Critics have noted that the study is limited because it captures a "thinking" brain rather than one in the midst of a religious experience, Andrew Newberg, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Spirituality and the Mind, told the The New York Times. The research only examined the brains of people with traditional Western religious beliefs, but, Grafman says, he's looking for collaborators who can help test the findings in other cultures.

Image courtesy of Wolfgang Wildner via Flickr

Tags: MRI, religion
More News Blog: Next: Can traffic up your heart attack risk? Previous: The Intel finalists, in their own words [Video]

29 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. fsjis1 07:50 PM 3/13/09

    What about if you were to ask someone about a friend, or a parent. How would that differ than to ask them about God? Some people think of God in terms of a personal relationship. Others think of him as existing, and being, but not personal.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Bearhawk07 09:31 PM 3/13/09

    There was nothing surprising or new in this study. It made a very interesting headline though. I do not know what I think of this kind of reporting.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. kalwar.g 03:34 AM 3/14/09

    Stop making the headlines which does not make any sense to me. Just remember, God is everywhere-in brain, in soul, in legs...in blood and he not only lives inside but also in objects, nature and environment.

    "To see God you need to see yourself being a God." -Mybheja

    Thank you and God bless you all !

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. tharriss 09:35 AM 3/14/09

    If "everywhere" means "nowhere" I agree with you kalwar.g!

    I'm betting the same tests asking about Santa or the tooth fairy would have produced the same results.

    Spirituality and god beliefs seems to be some kind evolutionary brain short circuit of one's ability to reason, making otherwise rational people unable to think clearly, but be likewise unable to notice the impairment. They are like the people who can't carry a tune but are convinced they can sing really well and can't understand why people wince when they belt out an awful song. Unfortunately for humanity, it is a widespread trait.

    Live long and prosper.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. quantum_flux 05:04 PM 3/15/09

    God is so arbitrary. One person could think of God as an imaginary friend and another person could think of God as a helper monkey.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Ted Braun 07:40 PM 3/15/09

    It is obvious that "god thoughts" come from the same place as thoughts about imaginary friends. This science, coupled with historical evidence that images of god have always been influenced by culture should help us outgrow irrational religious beliefs that could end up having us all killed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Ted Braun 07:41 PM 3/15/09

    It is obvious that "god thoughts" come from the same place as thoughts about imaginary friends. This science, coupled with historical evidence that images of god have always been influenced by culture should help us outgrow irrational religious beliefs that could end up having us all killed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. robert schmidt 10:26 PM 3/15/09

    It's unfortunate that they couldn't find a "god centre" in the brain, because then we could treat it like any other disease. Now it seems to be everywhere, more like cancer than VD, a lot tougher to eradicate. Still the best medicine is logic, reason, critical thought and the scientific method. Teach these concepts to children early before the church and the U.S. theocracy robs them of their inquiring minds.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. scottyfox in reply to robert schmidt 08:12 PM 3/16/09

    This comment is almost laughable. Unfortunately, logic, reason, critical thought and the scientific method can only take us so far. In 1981, Stephan Hawking claimed physics would have a single equation that would explain life; no equation yet, and there hasn't been a single confirmed theory in physics since the Neutrino mass 28 years ago. Science isn't even marginally close to explaining everything about anything, and never will be. There is nothing wrong with believing in God; and anyone claiming that all theists are irrational is clearly displaying their own irrationality.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. johnwnorton 09:59 PM 3/16/09

    I await this headline: “fMRI revealed as giant Mood Ring! Millions of dollars and man-hours wasted!”

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. Carlton22 03:26 AM 3/17/09

    Why the fascination with the brain? It is only a form of computer, a recording device for the mind which is separate from the brain. The mind and brain allow for intellectual intelligence. The ancients thought more highly of heart intelligence, the heart having as many or more neurons than the brain. Within the heart is a sacred space, an interval, also known as the Secret Chamber of the Heart Chakra. St Therese of Avila described it as the Interior Castle. Within that castle is a majestic cathedral and on the high altar of that cathedral of the heart burns a triune, threefold unfed flame of Power, Wisdom, and Love. The unfed flame in our heart is our seat of authority and sets us apart from all other parts of the creation. It is our direct connection first to the Higher Mind also known as the Christ Mind (let that mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus...the kingdom of God is within you). Through the mediatorship of the Christ Mind is our direct connection to the individualized presence of God (I Am That I Am) also called the I Am Presence and thus to the Most High God. The heart is not the center of emotion, the solar plexus chakra is. Chakras are to the spiritual body what organs are to the physical body. We were created in the image and likeness of our God and our God is a consuming fire. We are spirit sparks of the One Flame. Chakras are like step down transformers for high frequency spiritual energy so that the soul and the four lower bodies of man can be nourished. We do not live by bread alone. The four lower bodies are the etheric (memory), mental (mind), emotional (emotion, feelings), and physical. Quantum physics is beginning to explain the relationship of the spiritual to the physical. Beyond the atom there are no "particles" but wave lengths, frequencies, vibrations, oscillations of energy from spirit to matter and from matter to spirit. All of life is composed of the same Light,, Energy, and Consciousness of God and has Innate Intelligence. At the quantum level there is no time or space there is only Here and Now and there is only Unity, we are One. The intellect can never understand this, the brain can never contain this, it is only discerned though the heart. When this is accomplished by the individual then the prophecy of Jesus is fulfilled, these things that I do ye shall do and more because I go unto the Father ... to re-establish the connection to the Divine that we along ago broke due to our disobedience and defiance of God when we declared ourselves unworthy to be God in manifestation

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. Adam 09:47 AM 3/17/09

    nice article

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. philgrimm 04:42 PM 3/17/09

    This reminds me of all the headlines about fifteen years ago, about a series of researchers who each discovered the site controlling addictions to various things: narcotics, cocaine, cigarettes, etc...

    It turned out that they all found the same site.

    Once again, I believe the editors of this site need to be called on the carpet for misleading their readers.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. pratandon 12:00 AM 3/18/09

    Does the so called God Center different in anatomical location from areas of the brain involved in any sort of cognitive function? If not, what does it prove?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. rajnilu 08:09 AM 3/18/09

    The title makes a great claim while in reality they pointed to the area of thinking. Thinking about God or a glass of beer is the same process. They could have gone further to check the brain of someone in deep trance like meditation. But that would activate the area of the brain responsible for non-verbal consciousness. There is nothing like a God point in the brain, nor a God in reality.
    Someone inquired to the great Indian philosopher, J. Krishnamurti, whether we were the creation of God. He replied: Its the other way around. God is our creation and not that we are his creation. I wish we were, then we would have been different!

    Those interested to explore more about brain processes in emotional intelligence or meditation may visit these webpage:-
    http://rewiringthebrain.net/
    http://www2.xlibris.com/bookstore/bookdisplay.asp?bookid=39251

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. rajnilu 08:11 AM 3/18/09

    The title makes a great claim while in reality they pointed to the area of thinking. Thinking about God or a glass of beer is the same process. They could have gone further to check the brain of someone in deep trance –like meditation. But that would activate the area of the brain responsible for non-verbal consciousness. There is nothing like a God point in the brain, nor a God in reality.
    Someone inquired to the great Indian philosopher, J. Krishnamurti, whether we were the creation of God. He replied: It’s the other way around. God is our creation and not that we are his creation. I wish we were, then we would have been different!

    Those interested to explore more about brain processes in emotional intelligence or meditation may visit these webpage:-
    http://rewiringthebrain.net/
    http://www2.xlibris.com/bookstore/bookdisplay.asp?bookid=39251

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  17. 17. bhuvanesh.tomar@gmail.com 05:55 PM 3/18/09

    I think science only thinks in finite terms and God as a whole is infinity. You cannot comprehend it by experimentation, individual or to a phenomenon.
    Einstein aptly quotes about science as "Scientific endeavor is a natural whole the parts of which mutually support one another in a way which, to be sure, no one can anticipate".
    Also he says about the human place in the universe
    "A human being is a part of a whole, called by us _universe_, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest... a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  18. 18. bhuvanesh.tomar@gmail.com 05:56 PM 3/18/09

    I think science only thinks in finite terms and God as a whole is infinity. You cannot comprehend it by experimentation, individual or to a phenomenon.
    Einstein aptly quotes about science as "Scientific endeavor is a natural whole the parts of which mutually support one another in a way which, to be sure, no one can anticipate".
    Also he says about the human place in the universe
    "A human being is a part of a whole, called by us _universe_, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest... a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  19. 19. bestofnothing in reply to johnwnorton 08:20 PM 3/18/09

    Hot off the presses at Scientific American: fMRI revealed as giant Mood Ring! Millions of dollars and man-hours wasted!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  20. 20. skeptical inqurer in reply to robert schmidt 10:10 PM 3/18/09

    Amen to your comment robert schmidt

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  21. 21. skeptical inqurer 10:13 PM 3/18/09

    Amen to your comment, robert schmidt

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  22. 22. Dolmance 01:42 AM 3/19/09

    God created our biology, so of course knowing God has a biological basis. But it's not like God isn't living among us. He goes under many names. Hirohito, Akihito, etc., etc,. So just worship the Emperor of Japan and your life will be better. Your hugs will be stronger and your kisses much longer, plus you'll most likely run into a lot of money. Peace. God bless.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  23. 23. JoshRom 01:54 AM 3/19/09

    This article doesn't mean anything. Of course it's in the prefrontal cortex. Would they expect it to appear in the temporal lobe?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  24. 24. Bob 02:44 AM 3/19/09

    Readers might be interested in articles at www.cosmic-mindreach.com. A new approach to delineating the structural dynamics of the cosmic order is introduced that encompasses all possible structural varieties to phenomenal experience. It offers a new methodology that complements traditional approaches to the physical, biological and social sciences. The website article Unified Theories, Fantasy & Cosmic Order is a good introduction.

    The methodology was explicitly demonstrated in a profound series of cosmic (spiritual?) insights over a period of many years. The first of them came when I was in a key management position with a Canadian natural gas utility company and probing deeply into the roots of organization structure as a result of a hostile company takeover. I was not religious. That first experience is described in the website article A Cosmic Insight. The insights were not capricious. They related to demonstrating specific aspects of how the cosmic order works in response to my quest and they stopped coming when I had a clear and accurate grasp of the concepts after many years. Except for the first five days of the first experience they all transcended my physical person. They did not arise organically from within me. Organical feedback to consciousness was suspended. They were clearly cosmic in nature, transcending my birth and my death. Although they did not arise organically a number of them used my nervous system to show how it works.

    There are a couple of advanced articles on the website that apply the methodology to demonstrate how the human nervous system meaning fully integrates experience synapse by synapse. The article Human Nervous System Part 1 shows how this works at the spinal level. Part 2 shows how spinal, proprioceptive, vestibular and other sensory inputs are meaningfull integrated with cerebral function by the Cerebellum synapse by synapse.

    Readers may find the website interesting. It shows how aspects of personal experience can transcend and subsume the physical universe in some circumstances.

    Best regards,
    Robert Campbell

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  25. 25. tharriss 09:23 AM 3/19/09

    Saying that science has to explain everything before it becomes irrational to believe in God is just a permanent silly excuse for continuing to believe in superstitions.

    Just because we don't have ALL the answers doesn't justify making up some sky fairy that fills in the gaps so you can feel comfortable with everything explained.

    There is a lot wrong with believing in God, since that very act is an active denial of reason. You can pretend the two can co-exist, but they can't. You have to actually choose to SELECTIVELY be reasonable if you want to do both, which is just silly. The fact that lots of people do it, doesn't make it a good thing for humanity, just a popular one.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  26. 26. scottyfox in reply to tharriss 09:44 PM 3/19/09

    "There is a lot wrong with believing in God, since that very act is an active denial of reason."
    Really? There's a lot wrong with believing in God? Like what? And how is it an active denial of reason?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  27. 27. Pictosurial 04:34 AM 3/20/09

    There will remain no real significant difference in a religious experience perceived as true or divine and in the artistic act of creating, but only from the latter is it possible to 'sail' through the synesthetic 'mood ring' via the psyche's conditioning to it's genetic code, medium and its surroundings; painting, music, literature, etc... Modern science is all so laughable when you think of how Leonardo unraveled his Mind and search for truth... By observing others one observes only the self, by observing the self one observes others...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  28. 28. raseclamid 03:57 AM 3/22/09

    It is time to ask why god. We are potentially the most destructive creature ever existed on earth. I could not imagine the dinosaurs having the same cognition as us. Probably the earth is a living entity in its own self. Maybe it is built in itself the program to preserved itself. Maybe all within it are guided to preserved it. While the dinosaurs existed for millions of years, the human species may only last a few hundred thousand years. And in that short span of time we are the most capable ever to destroy earth. Thats the reason why god??!!!!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  29. 29. raseclamid 03:58 AM 3/22/09

    It is time to ask why god. We are potentially the most destructive creature ever existed on earth. I could not imagine the dinosaurs having the same cognition as us. Probably the earth is a living entity in its own self. Maybe it is built in itself the program to preserved itself. Maybe all within it are guided to preserved it. While the dinosaurs existed for millions of years, the human species may only last a few hundred thousand years. And in that short span of time we are the most capable ever to destroy earth. Thats the reason why god??!!!!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

God on the brain? Scientists map religious thoughts with scans: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X