Mar 26, 2009 03:50 PM | 3
A Princeton University undergraduate working on her senior thesis found a bug in one of the detectors at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the gargantuan particle accelerator set to come back online before the end of the year. The Daily Princetonian reported this week that Xiaohang Quan "discovered errors that were leading to the appearances of double images" in the LHC's Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment and that Quan presented suggestions for how to fix the problem to scientists at CERN, the European lab for particle physics that operates the collider near Geneva, Switzerland.
But how common are such errors, and how worried should we be that a student, rather than a professional physicist, stumbled across one?
John S. Conway, a University of California, Davis, physicist (and Cosmic Variance blogger) who is part of the CMS team, says that finding such glitches is common and not cause for concern. He says Quan found "a bug in the software we use to reconstruct events" that "would have been found very quickly by any one of hundreds of other people who are testing our software every day." All the same, Conway says, "clearly this is a talented undergrad."
He adds that, alas, researchers working on the LHC "still have many, many software errors to find and correct in the coming months and years." The big ones, such as the snag Quan uncovered, will become apparent quickly. "Other bugs lead to rare or subtle effects that frankly we probably won't see until we start getting real data," Conway says. "But we will, and we will fix them."
Princeton physicist Christopher Tully, Quan's thesis adviser, sounded a similar tone in the Princetonian. He told the paper that "improvements to the algorithms are part of a normal process of scientific investigation that serve to improve the performance of the detectors." This kind of work, Tully added, "is business as usual for the physicists."
Photo of part of the CMS under construction in 2007 © CERN
Tags:
particle physics,
undergraduate,
high-energy physics,
LHC error,
Xiaohang Quan,
atom smasher
More News Blog:
Next: Food makers and distributors don't know who's receiving, supplying their products, government report says
Previous: CSI Alaska: Air crash victim identified after 60 years
Deadline: Jul 30 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Seeker desires a method for producing pseudoephedrine products in such a way that it will be extremely difficult for clandestine che
Deadline: Jul 14 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Powered By: 
3 Comments
Add CommentThis thing is amazing.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThey really need to get some artistic photographers in there who can capture the wild environment, the feel and excitement of the most technologically advanced work of the human race.
The arrogance of the Tully's quote is especially off-putting, but to be expected from these types. This is why we hire them to crunch big numbers, and not deal with people.
All software is buggy. Anyone who reviews software can find bugs and other issues to correct.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI am glad this student was paying attention and found one of them.
The difference between a student and a pro is that one works to get a degree, the other for money.
This has been over sensationalized because of misunderstandings about how particle physicists work together and the role undergraduates play in our collaborations. My response on the US/LHC Blogs is here: http://blogs.uslhc.us/?p=1060
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this