News Blog

News Blog


IBM and Caltech experiment with DNA-size computer chips

IBM, DNA, origami, nanotechGadget makers have for decades relied on ever-shrinking microchips to make more portable, yet more powerful, devices. But as the components used to make these chips become smaller, with widths measured in dozens rather than hundreds of nanometers, they become increasingly more difficult to assemble. 

Since microchips are the engines performing the logic functions that make computers, cell phones and countless other electronic gadgets run, technology makers like IBM have been looking to pack more transistors closer together in smaller spaces. 

Now comes a potential solution. IBM Research and the California Institute of Technology researchers say they may have found a way to control the placement of silicon nanowires, carbon nanotubes and other tiny components on microchips through the use of synthetic DNA and tiny lithographic templates. The scientists used the DNA molecules to function as scaffolding, to help deposit millions of nanosize particles in precise patterns, according to a study to be published in the September issue of Nature Nanotechnology . ( Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group). The templates help the nanoparticles hold their shape.

When the DNA is folded into certain origami-like structures, it might even possible to place components six nanometers apart (even thinner than a cell membrane), whereas conventional semiconductor fabrication techniques are struggling to reach placement closer than 22 nanometers (a number thought to be out of reach just a few years ago).

DNA origami is created by using hundreds of short DNA strands (also called "staples") to fold much longer genetic ribbons into nanoscale shapes and patterns. Some researchers think that DNA origami proves microscopic material can be controlled to form specific objects, including smaller circuits.

Technology makers are looking for ways to keep pace with Moore's law, an observation by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 that the number of transistors placed on an integrated circuit doubles every two years. The cost to continually shrink electronic components to improve performance is a limiting factor in keeping pace with Moore's law and "a concern across the semiconductor industry," Spike Narayan, manager for science and technology at IBM's Almaden Research Center in San Jose, Calif., said in a prepared statement. IBM seeks better ways to assemble microchip components at the nanoscale without the need to replace existing chip-making technology.

There is a downside to this in that smaller components create more complexity and require some way of dissipating heat before it destroys the surrounding circuitry.

Of course, IBM and other tech companies have some time to work this out: the company says it will be at least a decade before its DNA microchips are ready for the market, according to the Guardian UK .

Image of triangular DNA origami adhering to a template © IBM

Tags: IBM, origami, Moore's law, DNA
More News Blog: Next: Marijuana growers started California wildfires Previous: Bountiful bikes: Can a share program get more people cycling around cities?

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. hotblack 11:47 PM 8/17/09

    Well obviously Moore's law is going to have a limit or in a hundred years there'd be more transistors packed on to an IC chip than there are atoms in the universe. Trying to keep pace is silly.

    At some point, the performance boosts are going to start having to come from bringing the rest of the components up to speed...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. galaxy_man 12:06 PM 8/18/09

    I'm putting my money on quantum computing. Even if it takes longer, it has a lot more potential than conventional semi-conductor based transistors.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. EllipticalElement 10:06 AM 8/20/09

    I wonder if this chips could be used to medical purposes in such diseases as schizophrenia , bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder. If somedody could answer me i would appreciate it. :)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

IBM and Caltech experiment with DNA-size computer chips: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X