Subscription Center
May 19, 2009 05:05 PM | 6
Designing green buildings sounds like a great idea. But the reality is that energy-efficient buildings often sound downright crummy to the people inside them.
Surveys of occupants generally find that buildings meeting the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards, the benchmarks for greenness, score higher on all measures except one: acoustics. “It’s not a happy story,” Kevin Powell, research director for the U.S. General Services Administration, told the audience on the opening day of the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in Portland, Oregon.
The GSA houses more than one million government workers in about 8,500 buildings across the nation. In post-occupancy surveys, acoustics often received poor marks. And while federal LEED-rated buildings scored a bit better than non-LEED buildings, on a separate survey commercial LEED-rated buildings scored worse than non-LEED buildings when it comes to noise, he said.
Some design elements that score well on LEED checklists, such as bare concrete ceilings that improve heating and cooling efficiency or low cubicle walls that reduce lighting needs, also allow sound to travel farther. A paradoxical problem: High-efficiency heating and cooling systems in LEED-rated buildings tend to be much quieter than wasteful ones, lowering inoffensive background noise that can mask distracting sounds.
Until recently, advocates of green building have neglected acoustical criteria. The ASA meeting marks the first time 
acoustical scientists and engineers have put the problems of green building design on its program. “There’s a need for the profession to understand what’s going on in the LEED world and a need for the LEED world to understand what’s going on in acoustics,” said session co-chair David Sykes, a consultant with Remington Advisors in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Acoustical measures are becoming part of LEED-standards and building codes for hospitals and schools, but noise is often an afterthought for less specialized structures. Powell made a plea to the acoustical experts. “We need you to help us with best practices and enforceable standards that are achievable,” he said, because only when there is a clear and simple check box for acoustics will the indoor environment of green buildings ring true.
That might be tough to pull off because much of sound perception is subjective. As Powell pointed out, “There is no agreed-upon consensus of what good acoustics are.”
Top image: At the US General Services Administration, Auburn, WA, low, moveable partitions made of hard materials allow daylight – and voices – to diffuse across space. Bottom image: At the US Coast Guard, Oakland, CA, layout provides opportunities for collaboration; partitions provide some acoustical screening. Both courtesy Kevin Powell, USGSA
Tags:
LEED noise
More News Blog:
Next: Palm's Pre smartphone lands June 6--Will anyone be waiting at the gate?
Previous: Hubble released from space shuttle's grasp
See what we're tweeting about
Deadline: Jul 14 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Jun 29 2013
Reward: $7,000 USD
The Seeker for this Challenge desires proposals for chemical methods that could rapidly degrade a dilute aqueous solution
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
6 Comments
Add CommentTapestries?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhy not make a concrete ceiling with a rough finish surface? This will prevent sound to resonate while maintaining the building's heating and cooling efficiency.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisInteresting how this Design era compares with the Bauhaus in terms of lousy acoustics - now facilitated by use of Ipod Headphones and Bluetooth telephone headsets...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisthen it was tinny little radio speakers or Phonograph horns with low frequency response hardly reaching the lower registers of human speech
that were acceptable:
contrast this design regime to the utterly acoustically functional overstuffed furniture of a fin de siecle living room which may of had a piano and singing!
Fascinating. I wrote a little about this a while ago - http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2007/10/indiscreet-musi.html - noting that a recent 5-star Green Star (Aussie equivalent of LEED) building here in Sydney has had white noise pumped into the building to compensate for the loss of air-con noise etc. I wondered about the design of that noise ...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI'm a Sydney-sider sensitive to noise and simply won't eat in shiny surface restaurants' cacophony of noise - so how about this, I believe opera/concert halls use hanging acoustic adjusters, so I imagine e.g. the odd suspended sections of something like carpet could reduce a lot of the clash of reflected noise common to hard floor/wall/ceiling spaces?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWith our efforts to implement green building practices, has come a change in mindset regarding interior office space designs. Space planners are using cubicles to replace drywall partitions (i.e. call centers), and the consequence is a higher level of noise traveling through the open spaces. But as cityofsound points out, white noise programs have been used to mitigate the problem, with great success.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this