Subscription Center
Dec 4, 2008 01:38 PM | 2
NASA announced today that it will delay the launch of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) until late 2011, postponing the rover's sweeping mission by more than two years.
In a news briefing, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said that the agency was "not going to gamble on launch" in fall 2009. The agency says it needs more time to ready and test the equipment to ensure a successful mission, and the launch window to reach Mars requires a 26-month delay.
"The vast majority of the hardware has been built and completed," Charles Elachi, director of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said at the press conference held at NASA headquarters in Washington, D.C. But there was no guarantee the MSL would be ready by next fall to land safely and carry out science experiments on Mars. This project, Elachi said, is much more complex than its predecessors. Doug McCuistion, director of the Mars Exploration Program at NASA HQ, added that MSL "literally dwarfs anything we've done before," with the rover weighing in at nearly a ton compared with about 400 pounds apiece for the Spirit and Opportunity rovers.
"Failure is not an option," McCuistion said, noting that the only way to avoid it is "to test [the rover] to within an inch of its life." He estimated that delaying the mission until 2011 would add $400 million to the project's price tag as staff and facilities are kept on hold and further tests are carried out, bringing the total tab to around $2.3 billion—a number that may still rise.
The mission is designed to determine whether Mars ever sustained life, to examine in greater detail the Martian surface and climate, and to help prepare for a future human presence on the Red Planet.
Artist's conception of Mars Science Laboratory courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech
Tags:
NASA,
mars rover,
mars lander,
life on Mars,
space exploration
More News Blog:
Next: Climate change is old news: Scientists predicted global warming more than a century ago
Previous: Breathe easy? Green inhalers are good for the environment, but are they good for asthma sufferers?
See what we're tweeting about
Dhunterauthor Taking it Personally: Privilege… http://t.co/NvXRzoVBwd
BoraZ RT @michaelpollan: Dear American Consumers: Please don’t start eating healthfully. Sincerely, the Food Industry http://t.co/5Qpfbgpro0
JenLucPiquant Unfussy Female Poison Frogs Just Go For Closest Male. "She could just mate with the first male she finds." http://t.co/Egf1l3hhpl
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Jun 29 2013
Reward: $7,000 USD
The Seeker for this Challenge desires proposals for chemical methods that could rapidly degrade a dilute aqueous solution
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
2 Comments
Add Comment2.5 Billion gets a robot on Mars. 100 BIllion gets you and 5 friends into a 400km low earth orbit in the ISS. NASAs budget should be allocated to more robotic missions, and less on putting life support systems in space.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this1 Trillion neither completes a war or fixes an economy.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSo with 2 Trillion we could have landed 800 tons of equipment on Mars? Oh well, another missed oppritunity.
Of course 769,230 MW of wind turbines for 2 Tril to raise wind power up to 5% would have been nice as well.