Subscription Center
Sep 7, 2009 08:15 PM | 6
There appears to be literally nothing microbes cannot do. From the invention of photosynthesis to lifecycles that require no sunlight—even surviving extreme radiation—the most extreme microbes thrive almost everywhere scientists look. And now microbiologists have added two more energy-related tricks to the microbial arsenal.
At the European Society for General Microbiology meeting this week, Richard Johnson and his fellow scientists from the University of Essex will present research showing that a mixed ecosystem of particular bacteria can survive—and clean up—one of the most lethal man-made environments: the residue from extracting petroleum from oil sands.
Extracting this heavy oil and refining it produces a slew of toxic waste, particularly water with naphthenic acid (one of the secret ingredients of napalm). In Athabasca region of Canada—home to much of the oil sands industry—there are at least one billion cubic meters of such polluted water sitting in local ponds.
What to do? Unleash bacteria, Johnson says. The microbes can break down the naphthenic acid into more benign byproducts in a few days rather than the decade or more it can take naturally. This can cut down on the environmental impact of producing oil from tar sands, of which there is an estimated 3.6 trillion barrels (double known conventional oil reserves).
It does not, however, address that other related byproduct: climate change caused by the greenhouse gases emitted when the oil is burned. Maybe microbes can help with that too (after all, they were responsible for the composition of the atmosphere until humans came along).
And it turns out E. coli—most famous for its role in food poisoning—does a pretty good job of cleaning up another potentially important but lethal energy source: radioactive waste. Lynne Macaskie and colleagues at the University of Birmingham show in another presentation at the same meeting how said E. coli, in conjunction with a cheap, widely available chemical (inositol phosphate), can recover uranium from the polluted waters of mines.
Basically, the E. coli break down the chemical and free the phosphate, which then bonds with the uranium and forms a precipitate on the exterior of the cell that can be harvested.
The researchers estimate that such recovered uranium would cost about 15 cents per gram of the nuclear fuel element. But it also offers an environmental protection advantage, removing radioactive material from the mine tailings. The process could even be used on spent fuel rods and other nuclear waste.
Image: Courtesy of USDA Agricultural Research Service / Photo by Eric Erbe, digital colorization by Christopher Pooley
More News Blog: Next: Are firefighters raising healthcare costs? Previous: Going the 'last mile' to deliver better health to villages in the developing world
See what we're tweeting about
DrJudyStone So many thank yous for the kind words and RTs on my Lieberman post: @lindy2350 @HealthCulture @nigelcameron @PJRAllen @beyondmeds
JenLucPiquant In which @bug_girl documents the only time she knows of cicadas being used to commit a felony. http://t.co/SoiVJnoWcN JenLucPiquant J.R.R. Tolkien's 'Fall of Arthur' and the path to Middle-Earth http://t.co/JtMfISlCWI
Deadline: Jul 15 2013
Reward: $5,000 USD
SciBX: Science-Business eXchange, a joint publication from the makers
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
6 Comments
Add CommentSounds like another futile techie solution. What do we do with the polluted, radioactive microbes?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisbongobimbo: you are pretty wrong. It is exactly the other side: bacterias can breack down this compunds, and the products may be beneficial to our society and the environment. Bacterias are already used in copper industry and other domestical waste. Bacterias don't "eat" radiactivity, they use some of the energy inside this compounds to their own physiological processes, like you eat chocolate!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisrodaguilar: bacteria is plural and bacterium is singular.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisYou're right about the chocolate part (I'm addicted to it).
But we have known this for over 40 years, in my experience, that bacteria can clean up a reiver stream polluted with heavy oil residues
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this"a precipitate on the exterior of the cell that can be harvested" doesn't make it sound like the bacteria metabolize the uranium. Generally, I wouldn't expect them to, because metabolism is a chemical process. Changing uranium in to some non-radioactive element would need to be an atomic process. This is not generally what life deals with.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFor mine tailings it makes some sense, since the uranium could be gathered and refined instead of leaking out in to the environment. For fuel rods, it really seems you have the exact same problem when the bacteria are done.
In other words, this only solves the "how do we stop the waste from leaking?" problem, but not the "how do we prevent radiation from killing things and destroying ecosystems?" problem.
So get to it! - The cleaning-up, that is, not further extraction ;-)
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMy hope is that there will soon be a complete moratorium on burning hydrocarbons - and a corresponding limit on production. Why? Cos the usefulness of these compounds in future products (say next century, or five centuries from now - if we get rid of the current murdering luddites in power and manage to survive) will be way beyond what we gain by wantonly destroying them.