News Blog

News Blog


Nein! German schoolboy's NASA correction refuted

Late yesterday, it seemed that a calculation in a report that a German boy submitted to a science fair was about to shame the processing power of the mighty NASA. But, alas, a new article in London's Guardian says the kid has potential, but, in this case, was, well, wrong. At issue: the asteroid Apophis, which could be on a collision course with Earth. In 2004, NASA estimated that the relatively close, 690 to 1080-foot (210-330 meter) diameter object had a 2.7 percent chance of striking our planet on April 13, 2029. Subsequent data from the Arecibo planetary radar telescope shed more light on the asteroid's trajectory and trimmed the odds of a crash on that date to zip but to "miniscule" on April 13, 2036. How miniscule? One in 45,000, according to NASA.But the German newspaper Potsdamer Neuerster Nachrichten reported yesterday that 13-year-old Nico Marquardt had used findings from a telescope at the Institute of Astrophysics in Potsdam to determine that NASA was way off– and that it was actually 100 times more likely than the space agency had predicted that Apophis would slam into Earth. (Here is a story from a different German newspaper called Der Tagesspiegel.) His reason: NASA scientists had not taken into account the possibility that when the asteroid approached Earth in 2029, it could strike one of 40,000 artificial satellites currently orbiting Earth. That collision could change the trajectory of Apophis, giving it a much better shot of hitting Earth seven years later if it were knocked off course enough to go through a roughly 2,000-ft (600 m) region of space known as a keyhole, where Earth's gravity would set it on a collision path. The newspaper reported that Marquardt's calculations had been accepted by both NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA), but both deny they signed off. "This student's conclusion reportedly is based on the possibility of a collision with an artificial satellite during the asteroid's close approach in April 2029. However, the asteroid will not pass near the main belt of geosynchronous satellites in 2029, and the chance of a collision with a satellite is exceedingly remote," NASA said in a statement released today. "Therefore, consideration of this satellite collision scenario does not affect the current impact probability estimate for Apophis, which remains at 1 in 45,000." The ESA concurred, confirming to the London Register that the boy erred.Nice try, kid.

More News Blog: Next: Saving wildlife by killing it Previous: Dark matter announcement sinks like a stone

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Nein! German schoolboy's NASA correction refuted: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X