News Blog

News Blog


New play tells the story of Rosalind Franklin, the woman behind DNA's double helix

The Fountain Theatre in Hollywood California this month will begin running Photograph 51, a play about the human drama driving one of the most important discoveries of 20th century biology – the illumination of DNA's double helix structure. The play focuses on the role of British biophysicist Rosalind Franklin in the discovery. Many argue that her contribution, which went largely unnoticed, was so crucial that she deserved to, at the least, share the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for uncovering it that was instead snagged by geneticist James Watson and biophysicists Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins.

Photograph 51 begins in 1951 when Franklin first arrives at King's College in London from the Laboratoire Central des Services Chimiques de l'Etat in Paris to study the structure of biological molecules. It's right around the time that Watson and Crick are trying to construct a model of DNA at Cambridge University, says director Simon Levy. Franklin's character, Levy says, is "very self-assertive and determined, a work-ethic driven woman trying to establish herself in what was then a very male-dominated world." She works alongside Maurice Wilkins, Levy says, "a brilliant scientist but sort of socially inept [who] has difficulty dealing with her strength and her spirit."

The place traces the string of events leading up to the 1953 discovery of the DNA double helix, including the key moment when Wilkins – without Franklin's knowledge or permission -- shows Watson the famous "photograph 51," an image of DNA that Franklin had captured using a technique called x-ray diffraction (To the average person, photograph 51 looks somewhat like a striped letter "X," but to Watson’s trained eye, it revealed the molecule’s twisted ladder shape.)

According to Levy, Wilkins's character does this because he's impressed with Franklin's work. Watson, longing to be the one who discovers the "secret of life," shows the image to Crick and together they construct their Nobel Prize-winning DNA model based on it, eventually becoming superstars in the scientific community and giving Franklin little credit for her contributions. The play concludes in 1958 with Franklin's death at age 37 from ovarian cancer. She never married or had kids and would receive little recognition for her contribution to the DNA model for which Watson, Crick and Wilkins would share a Nobel four years later.

Did Franklin understand the importance of her contributions? Did she have regrets about her involvement in the double helix saga? Was she partly responsible for not getting recognition, or was she simply a victim cast aside by the boys club? These are some of the questions the play attempts to answer, Levy says.

"Watson, Crick and Wilkins could certainly have done more to acknowledge her, especially in accepting the Nobel," says playwright Anna Ziegler, who based the play on a variety of sources, including Brenda Maddox's biography Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA and James Watson's The Double Helix. In a sense, they did steal her work, Ziegler says, but she adds that Franklin may also have been partly to blame because she was not particularly interested in collaboration. "My take on Rosalind Franklin's character, and what I find so juicy, fascinating and sad about her," Zeigler says, "has to do with her own tragic flaws--her inability or refusal to form useful working relationships with certain people."

Rosalind Franklin's story is not that of a wronged heroine, London-based journalist and Franklin-biographer Maddox tells ScientificAmerican.com. In fact, Franklin was never particularly interested in studying DNA, Maddox says, noting that she left King's College in 1953 to study viruses at Birkbeck College in London -- before Watson and Crick even constructed their DNA model – and her career studying viruses was much more important to her.  "Up until she was dying, her papers were being published everywhere," Maddox says, adding that Franklin never lived to see the other scientists basking in their Nobel glory anyway and, even if she had, the Nobel Foundation does not award the prize posthumously.

Photograph 51 won the 2008 STAGE International Script Competition, an award given by The Professional Artists Lab and the California NanoSystems Institute at the University of California at Santa Barbara to plays that deal with science. The judges of the competition include not only Pulitzer-Prize winning playwrights but Nobel laureate scientists (Watson, 80, was not one of them!).

The play runs one hour and 40 minutes and will be playing Thursday through Saturday at 8 P.M. and Sundays at 2pm from March 21 through May 3.

Image credit: The National Library of Medicine via Wikimedia Commons

Tags: 51, photograph, franklin, DNA, rosalind
More News Blog: Next: Computers have a lot to learn from the human brain, engineers say Previous: Regrowth after wildfires, and space elevators: More from the Intel STS

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Clare D 04:25 PM 3/10/09

    Any chance this might come over to the UK? I'd love to see it.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. scientific earthling 04:59 PM 3/10/09

    Anyone who read the double helix will agree its high time we gave this scientist credit for what she did.
    More people need to know about her.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. humangenome50K 02:05 PM 3/11/09

    It is high time that Rosalind Franklin is recognized for her important part in the double-helix discovery. Excuses like "Nobel committee do not give posthumous awards" can be over ruled by an exception. To be honest, we all know there are always exception to the rule in every feild and events.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. choffman 11:06 PM 3/17/09

    It might of interest to know that there is ANOTHER play, on the legacy of Rosalind Franklin, which was published 9 years ago, in 2000, called "One of These Days", by David Walsh, who's a retired McGill University Professor of Physics. It came out even more Brenda Maddox's book, which was published in 2002. The play, "One of These Days" is a little gem, I found, because while using the dramatic genre David Walsh manages to explain the very complex DNA science. He describes the double-helix structure itself and how the model came about, in easy layperson terminology. For those of you who are interested, you can buy a copy by contacting drdavidwalsh@gmail.com directly, assuming that's still his email. I saw the play several years ago now. Note: I post this comment not to detract from Ziegler's work, but simply to let people know that there is another work out there as well, for those interested in the "hard" science aspect of things and who thus who may also wish to read or see "One of These Days".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

New play tells the story of Rosalind Franklin, the woman behind DNA's double helix: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X