Subscription Center
Apr 17, 2009 06:50 PM | 3
.jpg)
Take heart: there's a new way to detect whether someone has suffered a so-called silent heart attack, one in which vessels to the ticker become blocked but there are few of the typical telltale signs such as chest pain. The bad news: it appears that more people than previously believed are suffering from these unrecognized myocardial infarctions, according to a new study.
Silent heart attacks cause vague symptoms such as shortness of breath or heartburn-like sensations that usually fade with time, often leading victims – and even physicians – to assume they were nothing serious. The potential danger: the victims are more likely to die from future heart attacks, irregular heart rhythms, and other heart-related ailments but may take no additional precautions.
Every year, about 1,460,000 Americans suffer from heart attacks, and 195,000 (or 13 percent) of those attacks go unnoticed, according to a 2009 report by the American Heart Association. But study coauthor Han Kim, a cardiologist at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., suspects there are probably twice as many silent heart attacks as the stats suggest. The reason, he says: the method currently used to detect heart damage wrought by them – the electrocardiogram (EKG), which measures the electrical activity of the heart – is not a surefire test.
But Kim and his colleagues at Duke and Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago discovered that another technology often used to assess damage after obvious heart attacks called delayed enhancement cardiovascular resonance (DE-CMR) can pick up damage that EKGs may miss. DE-CMR uses magnets and radio waves to generate images of the heart.
The researchers report in next week's PLoS Medicine that they studied the heart health of 185 patients ages 25 to 86 who had no known history of heart trouble but had been flagged by their doctors as being at risk because of factors such as high cholesterol and blood pressure. After giving all the patients both EKG and DE-CMR tests, the researchers found that 65 of them (35 percent) had suffered silent heart attacks some time in the past; only 15 of those cases were picked up by the old EKG method, whereas 50 were detected by the new DE-CMR method.
What's more, patients who had suffered silent heart attacks detected with DE-CMR were more likely to die than those whose attacks were detected by EKG. Over an average two-year follow-up, only one out of 15 patients (7 percent) with EKG-detectable silent heart attacks died, whereas 15 out of 50 (30 percent) with DE-CMR-detectable cases died.
The next step, Kim says, is figuring out how common silent heart attacks are in the general population (not just those at risk for heart disease). Then, he says, "we can determine whether screening these patients and treating them early helps avoid deaths."
Image © iStockphoto/angelhell
Tags:
silent,
CMR,
EKG,
heart,
attacks
More News Blog:
Next: Wyden's vision for health care reform begins with making sure everyone is covered
Previous: Using GPS to track down asthma triggers
See what we're tweeting about
Deadline: Jul 14 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
3 Comments
Add CommentI read about new breakthrus in this area from two books i'm reading from christian wild. Now i need to find a dr. who uses these methods...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhy pay for expensive tests? If your in that high risk group change your eating and excercise habits anyway. If you have the test today and u havent had a silent attack are u going to have another test next week, next month, when?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIsnt it natural for us to believe we are healthy and not suffering from any disease ? I had a similar thought process until my physician asked me to get a heart scan done after he found that my basic cardiograms were not perfect. I discovered that there were calcium deposits in my coronary arteries and I was at a serious risk of a heart attack. I was shocked and went ahead with the Cardiologist's suggestion of an advanced diagnostic scan. Though its always tough to undergo such experiences, I was not at any kind of discomfort at the Elitehealth.com advanced heart scan facility. I am not an expert in medical appliance and machines but could feel that the equipment was world-class and I was in safe hands. That feeling is really very important for me and thats how it actually went on. The facilities for Full Body Scan were as good as they can get.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://www.elitehealth.com/heart_scans.php