News Blog

News Blog


Obama halts last-minute Bush regs

Pres. Barack Obama yesterday put all pending regulatory changes made in the waning months of the Bush administration on hold until he has a chance to review them.

Obama spokesperson Bill Burton told The Washington Post he's not sure how many regs are affected by the order. Former Bush official Susan Dudley of the Office of Management and Budget said the administration had issued 100 rules since November. But it’s not clear how many of them have already taken effect.

A spokesperson at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said today that one of the most controversial of the last-minute Bush measures took effect yesterday. That reg, known as the "right to conscience" rule, allows the government to withhold money from federally funded health care facilities that do not make allowances for workers who refuse on moral grounds to help administer certain procedures, such as abortions. Reproductive rights groups last week sued to block the reg from taking effect, charging that it's unlawful.  

Another rule allows federal regulators to ignore the potential carbon dioxide output of new coal-fired plants when considering applications for permission to build them. A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) spokesperson said the agency would clarify the status of that reg later today. 

In another last-minute move, Bush last week took the gray wolf off the list of endangered species in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Idaho and Montana, drawing jeers from enviros.

Image by Matthias Kotter via Wikimedia Commons

Tags: endangered species, coal, carbon dioxide, George W. Bush, gray wolf, abortion, EPA, Barack Obama
More News Blog: Next: Clean air equals longer life, study says Previous: Saving the farmers and the land: Brits put cattle out to pasture in the moor

13 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. tlinget 05:38 PM 1/21/09

    Isn't this a Science magazine? Confirms my suspicion that the articles here are policitically motivated.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. CBeck 05:43 PM 1/21/09

    Scientists are citizens of this country, they get to be involved in politics, too - just like the religious folks get to be involved. Only difference - the churches get to influence politics tax-free.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. hotblack 05:45 PM 1/21/09

    Bunch of garbage snuck in at the last minute because no one would let it stand at any other point in his presidency. Glad to hear the midnight resolutions are being gutted.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. pblome 05:52 PM 1/21/09

    Many of these regulations are related to science...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. bkurilko 07:55 PM 1/21/09

    "Another rule allows federal regulators to ignore the potential carbon dioxide output of new coal-fired plants when considering applications for permission to build them."

    How does that even make sense? Is he TRYING to destroy the world or something? Good riddance you POS.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. LJF 08:32 PM 1/21/09

    How typical. Hide it ,lie about it , sneak it by.....Bush goes out still trying to impliment a scorched earth policy. Our earth.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. LJF 08:35 PM 1/21/09

    How typically Bush. Hide it, lie about, sneak it by. Still trying to impliment a scorched earth policy right down to the wire. Good on Obama for refusing to let it get by unchallenged.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Homer Simpson in reply to CBeck 08:37 PM 1/21/09

    And the scientist get to pay taxes from their funds, from taxes. =)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Homer Simpson in reply to CBeck 08:40 PM 1/21/09

    And the scientist get to buy things with the taxpayer's money, and to influence in politics so it can keep his funds rolling.
    its all about the economy. Politics, Science, Religion.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. batch 11:35 AM 1/22/09

    Midnight regulations should be banned. Any president had at least 4 years to propose, debate, amend, and implement those regulations. Why should they get to ignore due process in the last months of their administration?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. BuckSkinMan in reply to tlinget 03:31 AM 1/23/09

    Eh, you seem at once to misunderstand the purpose of Scientific American magazine and to "miss" the fact that it was Bush and the Republicans who politicized scientific matters.

    Since the Regressive Right purposely and with premeditation launched attack after attack against any science, scientist or teacher they "disagreed with" - it was they, not the scientists or science publications who are to blame. Such attacks are misuse of government authority - just the kind the Republicans warned us about for 40 years. The only legitimate actions in this situation are those including SciAm's reporting on President Obama's counter attack. Which comes - not too soon to suit most of us who believe in Science as the savior of our species.

    Until such people as you abandon your subservience to those who suckered you with their failed ideology and acknowledge that; your "criticisms" can hardly be taken as anything but the rambling rants of a crank.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. BuckSkinMan in reply to batch 03:32 AM 1/23/09

    Quite right. Thank you for bringing this up. :-)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. BuckSkinMan in reply to bkurilko 11:55 AM 1/23/09

    The thing we must keep in mind is that it wasn't just president Bush who "committed some random irresponsible act" - his actions were backed by the Republican party and the Republicans in the House and Senate.

    Remember too that these people weren't just being "silly" - they believed and still believe that they were acting in the right. A significant number (in the millions) of voters still believe the same and cheered such measures. So Bush himself believed he was performing one last heroic act in the face of overwhelming opposition.

    At least Barak Obama and the Democrats have settled (for now) on actions based on scientific findings. It is our job to see that they continue using that standard.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Obama halts last-minute Bush regs: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X