• More Blogs
• Observations »
• Bering in Mind »
• Cross-check »
• Extinction Countdown »
• Solar at Home »
• Expeditions »
• Guest Blog »
• Anecdotes from the Archive »

Scientists have long known that severely cutting food intake may lead to a longer life. But new research shows the phenom doesn't apply to everyone—or, should we say, to every mouse. A new study recently published in the online edition of The Journal of Nutrition found that reducing caloric intake only seems to prolong the lives of fat mice with low metabolisms.

"There has been this kind of settled paradigm that caloric restriction universally extends the life span of animals, [and] some have implied that it also applies to humans," says study lead author Rajindar Sohal, a pharmacologist at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. But he notes that he and his colleagues found that "extension of lifespan by food reduction will occur only if there is an energy imbalance [caused by a low metabolism]."

Scientists have known for more than 70 years that slashing caloric intake by an average of 30 percent to 40 percent extends the lives of animals as diverse as rodents and monkeys. But this effect is not seen across the board, according to Sohal. Some breeds of mice, for example, live 25 to 30 percent longer when their caloric intake is cut by 40 percent, while other breeds experience no benefit from shrinking calories.

Suspecting that metabolism (the speed at which calories are burned) might explain the discrepancy, the researchers compared the metabolic rates of two strains of mice: C57BL/6 mice, which are known to enjoy the life-extending effects of dieting, and DBA/2 mice, for whom dieting has been found to have no effect on life span. They found that C57BL/6 mice had much lower metabolisms than the DBA/2 mice, regardless of how much they consumed. C57BL/6 were also, on average, beefier. 

These findings suggest that calorie restriction does not have the same effect on every animal. In other words, going on diet won't prolong the lives of mice with high metabolisms (who are likely to be thin, anyway), but it could help obese mice with low metabolisms. Sohal speculates that humans will respond the same way, but notes that such studies aren't practical in people. "You can't put human [study subjects] on caloric restrictions all their lives," he says, but adds: "There is no reason why it couldn't apply to humans."

The next step is pinpointing the cause of these metabolic differences, Sohal says: "What I would like to know is, what are the specific genes that determine the difference in metabolic rate?"

Image credit ©iStockphoto.com/Jennifer Mathews

4 Comments

1. 1. darkmonk 08:13 PM 1/26/09

   Oh dear... I was counting on my not eating much with high metabolism to keep me around for a long time... Back to waiting for nanobots, then.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. bradpilon 11:53 AM 1/27/09

   Please fix your definitions Metabolism is NOT the speed at which calories are burned. This is Metabolic RATE. I expect better from SciAM.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. kid_rock 11:29 PM 7/16/10

   Cool! I can now go back to guiltlessly eating ice cream, pop, and pizza everyday. Thanks for the article.
   
   On the other hand, I wrote this article about extending your life:
   http://preview.tinyurl.com/2crxcve

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

4. 4. bfahrn 08:42 PM 2/25/11

   I eat what I please and enjoy it immensely! I don't give a Dm if I live to 100 because all kinds of aches and pains accumulate. Each individual has his own calorie needs. Stick to it. Stop eating as soon as satiety dings that tasty thrill. that's all.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this