Subscription Center
Jul 30, 2009 02:30 PM | 4
Last night, the U.S. House of Representatives came up six votes shy of passing a groundbreaking—but flawed— food safety bill. The House plans to give it another shot today.
With animal droppings contaminating our spinach with E. coli and bird feces leaving peanut butter with a Salmonella taint, food safety advocates have long urged a reform of our nation’s patchy safety network that regulates the growing, distributing, and processing of foods. In the United States, some 76 million people get food poisoning each year, and 325,000 of those end up in the hospital.
The Food Safety Enhancement Act would give the U.S. Food and Drug Administration the power to order mandatory food recalls and fine facilities $20,000 per day for certain violations. It would also leverage a $500 annual fee on food processors and facilities to help pay for enforcement and tighter oversight described in the $3.5-billion measure.
But the bill wasn’t just supposed to be about keeping feces out of our food; it was once supposed to scale back rampant antibiotic use and regulate cattle feed (which is sometimes laced with cow blood and—surprise—chicken poop). Last minute tweaking convinced industry lobbyists, such as the National Pork Producers Council, to get on board by scaling back antibiotic limits and easing recordkeeping requirements by livestock farms.
The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition says the bill would harm wildlife on farms and leave small-scale producers with a conservation ethic high and dry. The $500 fee would be the same for someone who “turns locally grown cabbage into kraut”—as Grist’s Tom Philpott puts it—and a company that churns out peanut butter for the country. The fee would also place onerous bookkeeping requirements on organic growers that duplicate procedures they follow under the USDA’s National Organic Program.
Yesterday's early vote failed to achieve the two-third majority required under special rules that streamline the passage of bills by limiting debate and prohibiting amendments. Today's vote has a better chance since the House needs only a simple majority.
Photo of peanut butter and bacon sandwich courtesy Inuyaki via Flickr
More News Blog: Next: Los Angeles claims a victory in reducing water usage Previous: Colorado power company wants to ratchet up fees on solar freeloaders
See what we're tweeting about
DNLee5 “@MonasLists: too tired to be awake, too awake to be asleep” // This, me, every morning #thestruggle DNLee5 Getting into the spirit, Happy Africa Day, Uhuru & Pamoja! #DispatchesDNLee DNLee5 “@Carnegro: A havoc of heauxs” // yes I approve this term. How does the poem go again...
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Jun 29 2013
Reward: $7,000 USD
The Seeker for this Challenge desires proposals for chemical methods that could rapidly degrade a dilute aqueous solution
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
4 Comments
Add CommentThis a test. All previous attempts to register have failed. Please excuse the interuption.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI'm glad to see that Salmonella won - I have them on my fantasy picks.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAnother instance of a country run by business and for business---the public be damned.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisdear si,
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisto clarify "joe poppa's" comment because i basically agree with it biut would tweek a little. another instance of congree both senators and representatives, run by business for business ---tha publick be damned!