News Blog

News Blog


Satellite collision debris could persist for years

Officials say that the crash this week between a U.S. commercial communications satellite and a defunct Russian satellite generated possibly thousands of pieces of debris that will hang around in low-Earth orbit for years. Vladimir Solovyov, chief of the Russian segment of the International Space Station (ISS), told reporters today that "debris from the collision could stay in orbit for up to 10,000 years, and even tiny fragments threaten spacecraft, because both travel at such a high orbiting speed." But Nicholas Johnson, NASA's chief scientist for space debris, says that's not correct. "Most of the debris will be down in decades, some perhaps as long as 100 or more years," Johnson says. He adds that NASA is waiting on military orbit monitors to assess the scene before making an estimated debris count.

"800 kilometers [500 miles] is a very popular orbit for remote Earth sensing and telecommunications satellites," Solovyov said. "The cloud [of debris] from the collision is a serious threat to them."

NASA has not revised its assessment, made immediately following the incident, that the debris clouds pose no significant risk to manned space operations, specifically the ISS and space shuttle Discovery, targeted for a launch later this month.

But some in the space community are using the collision as an opportunity to call for the development of systems to prevent such accidents from happening in the future. At present, space is a free-for-all with no rules of the road. "The collision offers a literally heaven-sent opportunity for the Obama administration to take forceful, visible and long-overdue measures to address a long-ignored issue of 'space debris,'" space consultant James Oberg told the AP.

Schematic showing all the trackable objects in low-Earth orbit before Tuesday's collision courtesy of NASA

Tags: orbital collision, space junk, iridium, russian satellite, space debris, satellite break-up, satellite crash
More News Blog: Next: FCC to TV stations ready to make the digital switch: Not so fast Previous: Steven Chu calls for alt-energy "revolution"

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Luca 03:32 PM 2/13/09

    No problem: You (US) have a new weapon system the so called ABL, Air Born Laser.

    It is very simple to locate a ground version wherever You want as an international controllod system in order to protect an international space asset as ISS.

    A third neutral country will be a proper location.

    An international crew running this AntiDebrisLaser will run this device.

    It will run on spare nighttime energy.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. rwilliston 01:13 PM 2/16/09

    First, a laser would only be moderately useful with large objects such as a satellite. It would however create a debris problem almost as bad as the current situation. Although the whole star wars concept seems to persist in the imagination, it is highly impractical as a solution to anything. If it could be made to work, it might serve to disable a working satellite but vapourizing it so that it is no longer a threat as a projectile is not presently possible. Correct me if I'm wrong.
    On the lighter side, I worked on specification of the coatings for the Iridium satellite antennae 15 years ago. It is nice to see that they are still functioning beyond their designed lifespan and in this case, aside from possibly a little driver error, the failure was primarily that of the other satellite. Space junk is an exponentially growing problem and this incident illustrates the need for limiting the number of satellites we throw into orbit just so we can all watch CNN and talk to China.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Josh83 in reply to Luca 03:11 AM 2/18/09

    A laser (or any other ASAT technology) would simply take one large piece of space junk and turn it into many smaller pieces of space junk. Each smaller piece is still traveling faster than a bullet and will cause similar damage in a collision.

    The space around our planet is just as much a part of our enviornment as our skies & oceans. We need to stop polluting it before it becomes unuseable.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Ehsan M 07:38 AM 2/24/09

    The satellite collision in earth orbit is like nuclear chain reaction where every peice of the collision can cause another accident few subsequent accidents can suddenly cause the loss of the entire satellites in nearby orbits in a matter of days or weeks.
    this requires urgent need for action to prevent further accidents or shooting down satellites from earth.
    with every accident the propbaibilities of further accidents are increased many folds.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Satellite collision debris could persist for years: Scientific American Blog

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X

About the Bering in Mind Blog

In this column presented by Scientific American Mind magazine, research psychologist Jesse Bering of Queen's University Belfast ponders some of the more obscure aspects of everyday human behavior. Ever wonder why yawning is contagious, why we point with our index fingers instead of our thumbs or whether being breastfed as an infant influences your sexual preferences as an adult? Get a closer look at the latest data as "Bering in Mind" tackles these and other quirky questions about human nature. Sign up for the RSS feed or friend Dr. Bering on Facebook and never miss an installment again.

X

About the Cross-check Blog

Every week, John Horgan takes a puckish, provocative look at breaking science. A former staff writer at Scientific American, he is the author of several books—most notably, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. He currently directs the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology. He lives in New York State's Hudson Highlands, where he plays ice hockey each winter to hone his cross-checking skills.

X

Expeditions Blog

Ever wonder what it's really like to be working in Antarctica or collecting core samples from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? Get a first-hand feel for scientific exploration by following the blog posts of researchers out in the field.

X

About the Extinction Countdown Blog

Several times a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. From unusual or little-known organisms like the giant spitting earthworm and the stinking hawk's-beard to popular favorites like cheetahs and koalas, Platt, a journalist specializing in environmental issues and technology, does his part to slow the countdown.

X

About the Guest Blog

The editors of Scientific American regularly encounter perspectives on science and technology that we believe our readers would find thought-provoking, fascinating, debatable and challenging. The guest blog is a forum for such opinions. The views expressed belong to the author and are not necessarily shared by Scientific American.

X

About the Solar at Home Blog

Follow Scientific American editor George Musser as he installs--or tries to install--solar photovoltaic panels on the roof of his suburban New Jersey home. You'll learn the literal nuts and bolts of going green with the sun and get energy-saving tips even if you aren't putting up panels.

Write to us with tips or comments at blog@sciam.com and follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sciam.

X