Subscription Center
Aug 3, 2009 01:08 PM | 1
A tool bag lost by a spacewalking astronaut in November appears to have met its end after more than eight months in orbit. The chief scientist at NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office says the tool kit should have reentered the atmosphere this morning. "We are waiting on a post-reentry assessment of time and location," to be completed later today by military space monitors, says Nicholas Johnson, who is based at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
The bag's anticipated reentry was noted over the weekend by Universe Today, which predicted a fireball over the Pacific Ocean at 9:16 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) as the kit completely burned up in the atmosphere.
During space shuttle Endeavour’s STS-126 mission to the International Space Station (ISS) in November, Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper lost control of the bag, which contained scrapers, wipes and a pair of grease guns. She and a fellow spacewalker were working on one of the ISS's Solar Alpha Rotary Joints, which allow the station's solar panels to track the changing position of the sun during orbit. Stefanyshyn-Piper had been cleaning some errant grease from the inside of a larger carrier bag when the tool kit drifted away.
At the time, NASA forecast that the tool kit would reenter the atmosphere and burn up in about six months. During its time in space, which proved to be a bit longer than predicted, the tool bag was trackable via Web sites such as Heavens Above, which provides orbital data for spacecraft and satellites. And at least one amateur stargazer even managed to catch the bag crossing the night sky on video.
Photo of tool bag drifting away from ISS: NASA
Tags:
debris,
space junk,
ISS tool bag,
STS-126
More News Blog:
Next: Power-hungry supercomputers going green
Previous: Quiet year for twister research in Tornado Alley
See what we're tweeting about
Horganism How should research on race and IQ be banned? See serious proposal in **Clarification of Clarification: http://t.co/qsE2BuysO6 via @sciam
notscientific Was it really cloning? The word "cloning" was only mentioned once in that new paper in the journal Cell http://t.co/UKBFbSPcfa #scilogs
MRAKdesign @mdichristina not me! Still rainy and crappy here. http://t.co/KEJPGtiHzg
Deadline: Aug 31 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Geoffrey Beene Foundation Alzheimer’s Initiative (GBFAI) is launching the 2013 Geoffrey Beene Global NeuroDiscovery Challenge whose
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
1 Comments
Add CommentIs the word "from" the right word? Wouldn't "overboard" be better as the ISS could be considered a vessel?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWouldn't you know - it was a woman who couldn't keep track of her tools!
Hey, if these were Craftsman tools can the finder turn in the smoldering hulk for new ones?
This never happened on "Star Trek". I can hear it now, Scotty says, "Cap'n I canna do warp nine, I've lost me grease gun overboard!"
OK, I'm done. LOL!!
Terry Thomas
Atlanta, Georgia USA