Subscription Center
Jan 16, 2009 07:20 PM
The feds want the folks who read Pap smear results that check for cervical cancer to take a more rigorous proficiency exam.
A proposal by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would require pathologists and cytologists taking the proficiency exam to read 20 instead of 10 slides of cells. But it would also allow them to take the exam once every two years instead of annually.
Poor analyses of Pap smears in the late 1980s that led to women dying of cervical cancer prompted Congress to pass the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments of 1988, which requires CMS to establish minimum quality standards for lab testing in the U.S. But the testing requirement for Pap smear readers wasn’t implemented on a nationwide basis until 2005.
Since then, pathologists and cytologists have apparently gotten better at reading the smears, with 33 percent failing the test in 2005 compared with 11 percent in 2007, according to CMS. Still, the agency says that's not good enough, especially since the death rate for minority women is falling slower than for white women. There were an estimated 11,070 cervical cancer diagnoses in the U.S. last year and 3,870 deaths, according to the National Cancer Institute.
The proposal is in today's Federal Register. CMS will issue a final ruling after the March 17 deadline to submit comments on the proposal.
Image of Pap smear via WikiMedia Commons
Tags:
HPV,
Pap smear,
cervical cancer
More News Blog:
Next: Energy secretary-designate Steven Chu not too busy to conduct heavy-duty physics
Previous: House Dems push for more than $80 billion in stimulus money for big tech projects
See what we're tweeting about
Deadline: Jul 30 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Seeker desires a method for producing pseudoephedrine products in such a way that it will be extremely difficult for clandestine che
Deadline: Jul 14 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
Comments
Add Comment