Subscription Center
Nov 24, 2008 05:03 PM | 2
The striped bass population in San Francisco Bay has been plummeting since the 1970s and now scientists know why: fish moms are passing down damaging pollutants in the water to their young, according to a new study published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Researchers say the findings may pave the way for stiff new regulations on the chemical culprits.
Striped bass and other fish have been dying in droves off the coast of San Francisco for decades; pollution from industry and agricultural runoff has long been blamed.
Now a team of scientists from the University of California, Davis, and the University of California, San Diego, have fingered the killer contaminants. They found that wild female fish from the Sacramento River produced eggs containing a host of pollutants at levels high enough to cause biological harm. The list includes chemicals called PBDEs (flame retardants), PCBs (a known carcinogen banned in the 1979), and a slew of pesticides. They even found DDT, the infamous pesticide linked to cancer that was banned in 1972 after being indicted in Rachel Carson's Silent Spring).
The scientists performed chemical analyses that showed that baby fish were inheriting these contaminants from their moms and that the pollutants were causing problems such as smaller brains and livers. The authors say that these problems probably lead many baby fish to an early death in the wild.
And it's not just a striped bass problem. These types of pollutants may accumulate in all kinds of fish and fowl, according to the report. Something to mull next time you're downing that surf and turf.
(Image of striped bass larva courtesy David Ostrach)
Tags:
fish,
San Francisco Bay,
Fishing,
fishery,
cancer,
DDT,
carcinogen,
development,
pollution
More News Blog:
Next: Ocean turning to acid at lightning speed
Previous: Dead heat: This cemetery's otherworldly energy is solar
See what we're tweeting about
scicurious Do we drink too much caffeine? http://t.co/IQlREQ67Lj NO! NO!! YOU CAN'T TAKE IT AWAY FROM ME! *clutches mug*
notscientific How noise pollution can potentially lead to marine mammals having "the bends." By @SaraMynott http://t.co/QHybUmqwXi #scitable
BoraZ Illusion of the week: It Kind Of Looks Like a Building http://t.co/A2ieqe8f3z by @illusionchasers at #SciAmBlogs
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Deadline: Jul 15 2013
Reward: $5,000 USD
SciBX: Science-Business eXchange, a joint publication from the makers
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
2 Comments
Add CommentI often wonder when people talk about animals why they don't seem to be including humans. We feel oh so sad for the fish, and so we should but what about us. We are animals and if they are being affected that way so are we. What is bad for birds and fish and deer etc. has got to be bad for us.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisPeggy that is one point of this paper. The fish are acting as sentinels for humans. Some compounds like PBDEs are found in high levels in womens breast milk and can be affecting childrens hormones and behavior.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this