Subscription Center
May 15, 2009 12:45 PM | 6
.jpg)
How can a Nobel Prize–winning physicist—now the nation's energy secretary—get a bunch of coal industry folks to sit up and take notice during a keynote speech? How about by announcing that the feds are planning to dispense $2.4 billion to research and develop so-called clean coal technology?
In fact, that's exactly what Steven Chu did today at a meeting of the National Coal Council in Washington, D.C., where he announced that the government plans to add another $800 million to the Clean Coal Power Initiative pot of cash designed to explore new ways to cut acid rain, smog and mercury pollution as well as $1.5 billion to probe carbon dioxide capture and storage (rather than venting it) from heavy emitters other than power plants (think: cement manufacturers and refineries).
"To prevent the worst effects of climate change, we must accelerate our efforts to capture and store carbon in a safe and cost-effective way," Chu said in delivering far more than a lump of coal to the coal industry. This funding will "help position the United States to lead the world in CCS technologies, which will be in increasing demand in the years ahead."
Chu also announced that Ramgen Power Systems in Bellevue, Wash., is set to receive $20 million to scale up its CO2 compression technology and that the Cholla Power Plant near Holbrook, Ariz., is slated to receive $70 million-plus to expand its coal gasification system. The remaining $50 million will fund a study of 10 possible geologic formations for long-term CO2 storage.
Image: DoE
Tags:
carbon sequestration,
clean coal,
carbon capture and storage,
climate change,
steven chu,
global warming,
energy
More News Blog:
Next: Old man Hubble looking younger by the day as tune-up proceeds
Previous: Obama taps New York City's Frieden to run CDC
See what we're tweeting about
johnrplatt Creepy alley http://t.co/WDE0f9Jc0p johnrplatt Let there be light! http://t.co/yj2SeCXfr6
BoraZ RT @deborahblum: Thx to @ShipLives for this great discussion: Science writing about monsters: Q&A w/ @deborahblum: http://t.co/Q4pactkNQf
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Jul 30 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Seeker desires a method for producing pseudoephedrine products in such a way that it will be extremely difficult for clandestine che
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
6 Comments
Add CommentWhat would if you could separate the carbon from the oxigen or even make a usefull product of it
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhat if you separate c-02 molocules ,ox.&ca.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisYou should visit w2energy.com. We have a technology which sequesters the CO2 and uses it as energy.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHow dare you Store this toxic waste when there is a new invention that has been offered for sale that will stop 87% and up of all toxic air pollution in all fields of industry! Contact the inventor Pauline Kish-Sloan at pekss services@netzero.com
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisUse oxygen in AIP propulsion (air independent engines) and store carbon in nano-constructor ready carbon.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisRecent studies reveal that all over the world pumping oil ,gas or water into or out of the ground causes local earth tremors due to rocks 'relaxing' as stresses on them vary. The same is true for overloading terrain with dammmed-up lakes, or removing rock from mines or quarries. Its all beacause of the redistribution of weight and pressures. And earth tremors reopen closed fractures, allowing trapped fluids to escape...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this