MESSENGER Spacecraft Resolves Some Mercury Mysteries and Creates New Ones

In March 2011 MESSENGER became the first spacecraft to orbit Mercury. NASA's satellite has been taking measurements since then, and has collected nearly 100,000 images of the solar system's smallest planet, and the one closest to the sun.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In March 2011 MESSENGER became the first spacecraft to orbit Mercury. NASA's satellite has been taking measurements since then, and has collected nearly 100,000 images of the solar system's smallest planet, and the one closest to the sun.

The image above was created using laser radar to measure surface elevation. It depicts a 1,200-kilometer-long swath of the planet’s northern plains, falsely colored so that darker colors represent lower regions and lighter areas represent higher elevations. The sinuous ridges, cracked craters and an odd bulge (the large whitish area shown on the left) indicate that the four-billion-year-old plains underwent significant distortion after they formed.

Until now many scientists thought Mercury became a geologically dead world soon after its formation. Instead, MESSENGER found several topographic features that appear to have tilted over time, suggesting that Mercury was geodynamically active for a longer period than expected. It may even be active today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists do not understand the forces that guided the topographic tilting and bulge formation. On other planets, a viscous molten mantle is responsible. But because Mercury has an extremely thin mantle, it is difficult to imagine how it could have transported such vast geologic expanses, researchers say.

Understanding Mercury's unusual dynamics could help scientists learn more about the formation and evolution of rocky planets.


By Sarah Fecht  

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe