9 Comments

1. 1. jameylynne 07:15 AM 3/22/12

   As the iron core of Mercury is surrounded by a mantle of Iron sulfide and the melting point of iron sulfide is much lower than iron, wouldn't the tidal effects of the sun at only 35 million miles away be sufficient to partially melt the iron sulfide in random areas creating the topographic tilting and bulge formation?

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. denverjims 02:50 PM 3/23/12

   Unless the wall of the crater in the lower right is lower than it's internal central plain, I'd say that the darker colors (red) are higher than lighter colors (yellow) instead of the opposite (as described in the article). Or am I missing something? Nonetheless, fascinating photograph.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. David Russell 06:42 PM 3/24/12

   Maybe being so close to the Sun (DUH). It may well be affected by the 11 year cycle, solar flares, near misses with incoming asteroids. It lives in a very tough neighborhood and we have not mapped the gravity on the Sun but I would imagine that intense magnetic fields may do some weird things and I remember hearing that Mercury was made mostly of metallic elements. So again, blame it on the biggest thing near it. Also perhaps it has some weird resonance with Venus that sits pretty close to it on occasion also.
   

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

4. 4. scottgordon in reply to denverjims 04:02 AM 3/25/12

   My guess is that it's a sloppy description. From the image, clearly the blue end of the spectrum = lower and the red end = higher (with white/grey being even higher than red).
   
   Best practice would be to include a colour <--> altitude scale but it's been left out for visual appeal.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

5. 5. Postman1 05:18 PM 3/25/12

   I didn't see anything here about the possible swelling of the planet.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

6. 6. David Russell in reply to Postman1 06:50 PM 3/25/12

   The sinuous ridges, cracked craters and an odd bulge (the large whitish area shown on the left) indicate that the four-billion-year-old plains underwent significant distortion after they formed.
   
   I am talking about gravity deformations. You have the sun HUGE and Venus Big that are each about 30 million miles away from Mercury. There may be some weird resonance going on or it may be inflicted by Solar Flares and other Solar events that. Mercury has been shown to have a weak but interesting magnetic field and the map shows some distortions.
   
   We really don't know much about this little planet and hopefully more and more knowledge will come from this expedition but it is really the first attention we have given the planet and already it is presenting surprises.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

7. 7. kiteman 06:34 AM 3/31/12

   Pink is highest.Red is high. Then yellow, green, turquoise.Purple is lowest.
   Not mentioned in the article: Does Mercury keep the same face towards the Sun?

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

8. 8. Quinn the Eskimo 05:02 PM 4/1/12

   I'm color blind. This photo is rather useless to me. Pretty, tho.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

9. 9. David Russell in reply to kiteman 11:56 AM 5/12/12

   Mercury is so close to the Sun that astronomers thought that there would probably be orbital coupling, like the Earth-Moon system (a tidally locked system). They expected the rotation period to be the same as the orbital period, so that one side of Mercury would always face the Sun, just like one side of the Moon always faces the Earth. Does the orbital period equal the rotation period for Mercury? It is a small planet and difficult to observe, so astronomers were not sure of its rotation period. They had to wait for the invention of radar to check it out. By bouncing a radar signal off the planet, they could measure the speed of its rotation and therefore determine the period of rotation (sort of the same way a highway patrol officer can get you clocked on the radar for being slightly over the speed limit on the highway). Are the orbital period and rotation period the same? No. The period for one orbit is about 88 days, while the period for one rotation is 59 days (pretty slow spinner, eh?). At first glance this doesn't seem to be very significant, but if you were to take the ratio of the periods, 59/88, you get a number close to 2/3. What's so great about that?
   
   The basic upshot is that there is a kind of coupling between the orbit and rotation, but not the one that was expected. For every two orbits around the Sun, Mercury rotates three times on its axis. Figure 1 shows how the orientation of an astronaut would change over time as Mercury went about the Sun. By the time the planet had made one orbit, Mercury would have made 1.5 (or 3/2) rotations; one more orbit, and there would be a total of three rotations - sort of unusual.
   
   Source www.uni.edu/morgans/astro/course/Notes/section4/new18.html

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this