Image Gallery | Space

Hottah Water: Curiosity Traverses an Ancient Martian Streambed

NASA's Curiosity rover has located geologic signs of ancient water flows on Mars, mission scientists announced in a September 27 news conference. Several spacecraft and landers have turned up various lines of evidence for past Mars water, but Curiosity is the first robot to get an up-close look at the rocks of a former streambed, according to a NASA prepared statement.

The rock pictured in the above mosaic from Mastcam 100, the rover's telephoto camera, shows evidence for a sedimentary makeup. "This rock is made up of round gravels [not visible in this image] in a matrix that is very sand-rich," said co-investigator Rebecca Williams of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Ariz. The gravel's round shape implies that it tumbled to its current location, but the pebbles are too large to be windblown. So the rock appears to have been deposited by flowing water sometime in Mars's past. "The consensus of the science team is that these are water-transported gravels in a vigorous stream," Williams added.

The rock outcrop, which has been named "Hottah" after Canada's Hottah Lake, has been disturbed since its formation, exposing the 10- to 15-centimeter-thick slab to view. "To us it just looked like someone came along the surface of Mars with a jackhammer and just lifted up the sidewalk," Curiosity project scientist John Grotzinger said. He added that the science team was still debating the possible cause for Hottah's exposure, but that the simplest explanation was the impact of a small meteorite that lifted the former gravel bed up out of the ground.

—John Matson

X

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Daniel35 06:27 PM 9/28/12

    So can we be sure it was water, not some other liquid? And if it was water, is that any big surprise? Might there be concentrated deposits of minerals? I guess I'd rather have it at the poles looking for ice.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. techjunkie 10:00 AM 9/29/12

    I tend to agree Daniel, our money and time would be better spent actually looking for real water/ice at the poles instead of proof that some area used to have water. All the research being done now could wait until we establish a base there in the next 20 to 40 years. Currently we need to look for usable resources instead of geologic history.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. rrocklin 01:12 PM 9/29/12

    They already know there is ice there.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. JennyChaco 07:17 PM 10/4/12

    (High Five) rrocklin.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. haade 12:09 PM 10/5/12

    What about googling "mars ice spectroscopy" first techjunkie?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. geojellyroll 06:00 PM 10/7/12

    'until we establish a base in the next 20 to 40 years'

    ....huh?

    There is no infrastructure currently doin this. Is it in a secret magic building at NASA? Even a manned spacecraft would take 25 years to deveolop..none of which is currently off any drawing board or being funded...let alone 'a base.

    People have this pollyanish concept of just going to Mars when the green light is given...that will be only the beginning of a 50 year process.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X