Image Gallery | Space

NASA's new rocket ready for test launch despite iffy future

Enlarge NASA/Kim Shiflett MORE IMAGES

The 100-meter-tall Ares 1-X rocket was rolled out to the launch pad Tuesday morning at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The rocket, targeted to launch October 27, is a test vehicle for Ares 1, which would carry astronauts to orbit via the Constellation program, the next-generation spaceflight system designed to replace the space shuttle and expected to come online around 2015.

But the future of Constellation, and of Ares 1 specifically, is hardly secure. An independent panel convened by the Obama administration to review NASA's plans for human spaceflight is expected to deliver its full assessment Thursday, but a summary version released in September deemed NASA to be "on an unsustainable trajectory." The Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee estimated that Constellation won't send astronauts into orbit before 2017, two years later than is commonly projected.

What is more, the International Space Station, only now nearing completion, is at risk of being deorbited in 2016 on NASA's current budget. If the space agency chose to keep the station flying until 2020 without a budget boost from Congress, one way to recoup the cost, the committee noted, would be to scrap Ares 1 altogether and rely on commercial firms to launch astronauts into orbit.

X

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. MCapro 02:03 PM 10/22/09

    I hate this administration. Less than 0.8% of total federal budget is unsustainable? Go f yourself Obama.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. frank smith 04:19 PM 10/22/09

    I have been following space flights since John Glenn and its Mercury ship, and have been proud of having been born in the USA since then, so it�s hard to believe that I'm losing the possibility of watching men's flight to Mars...
    I hope private companies can help NASA, USA and mankind to continue space exploration.
    Frank P. Smith, Chile

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. timjwilson 04:55 PM 10/22/09

    NASA is messed up and somehow it's Obama's fault?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. johnny5000 in reply to stew6302 08:48 PM 10/25/09

    stew will not destroy USA, although he is a mental case!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. ME-TECH-2 10:01 PM 10/26/09

    OK I will defend NASA. They are under pressure from
    foreign rocket guys. As institution maybe they moved
    too slow to confront the future.

    Real issue is not rockets -- yet issue is price of
    rockets compared to foreign competitors.

    This is getting a bit like European airbus and bong-ing.

    Maybe NASA should have more private sector
    contractors to compete on rocket competition and less government dependency.

    Mark

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. judgementday2012 in reply to ME-TECH-2 09:43 PM 10/28/09

    look up Space X, a private company started by Elon Musk. I think he and a few others will be the future of space exploration. Space X has already tested a rocket that can make it to orbit. The future of space exploration isn't just science and learning about our past, which is the main focus of NASA. I think more great things will be accomplished when you have a for profit system that will bring better direct return on investment. Mining asteroids for precious metals, mining the moon for helium-3, space tourism, these will make space exploration more sustainable in the future.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X