Image Gallery | Space

Curiosity Rover Takes a Bite out of Mars

Enlarge NASA/JPL–Caltech MORE IMAGES

NASA's Curiosity rover is really digging in at Rocknest, a patch of Martian sand the robot has been exploring for more than a week.

The photo above, from one of Curiosity's navigation cameras, shows an area of Rocknest sand "with what looks like three bite marks," as project scientist John Grotzinger put it in an October 18 teleconference with reporters. Each mark is a trench left by the scoop on Curiosity's robotic arm, which collects samples for analysis with the rover's onboard instruments.

But before Curiosity fired up its CheMin (Chemistry and Mineralogy) instrument to analyze the soil, it first had to purify its sample-collection instruments using Martian sand as a cleansing abrasive. And having already encountered man-made debris, which may have been strewn about during the rover's landing, mission scientists took caution not to stick any artificial objects into CheMin. The rover's second scoop at Rocknest contained a bright object that became cause for concern. Most of the science team, Grotzinger said, ultimately concluded that the bright fleck was probably indigenous to Mars, but nonetheless that sample was dumped in favor of a third scoop of sand (center).

Grotzinger said that the sample had been delivered to the onboard CheMin, which uses x-ray diffraction to assess mineralogical composition, and that data from the instrument would be transmitted to Earth soon.

—John Matson

X

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Acoyauh2 11:45 AM 10/23/12

    I'd still like to see an analysis of the white specks it found *under* the sand. "Probably" indigenous, and certainly intriguing, aren't they?
    If we're afraid of smearing plastic into the CheMin, could we at least zap them a little, see what comes out? I mean, just out of Curiosity?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Luc12345 02:04 AM 10/24/12

    Agree with Acoyauh2.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. bucove 08:53 PM 10/24/12

    gotta calibrate it first

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X