Image Gallery | Biology

Satellites and Fairy Circles: Orbital Imagery of Ring-Shaped Features Aims to Solve a Desert Mystery

Enlarge Denis Hesemans, Namib Balloon Safaris MORE IMAGES

The eastern boundary of the Namib Desert is home to tens of thousands of "fairy circles," barren patches within the grassland. They are typically concave, although some are flat, and they are often surrounded by a ring of unusually tall grass.* Scientists are still unsure what causes fairy circles, but a paper published today in Public Library of Science ONE describes the life cycle of the formations, using both field data and satellite images.

Walter Tschinkel, a biologist at The Florida State University, compared satellite images of the circle-strewn area in 2004 with images from 2008, noting whether the formations were present in both years and what changes had occurred in size, shape or vegetation. He also studied ground photographs of circles and images from Google Earth for a more detailed look at the sizes and locations of circles as well as how they changed over time.

Previous research had indicated that the fairy circles were not static, but Tschinkel’s work was the first to document the details of the life cycle:birth, maturation, enlargement and death—or revegetation. His paper describes the different phases and estimates the life span of a fairy circle to be 23 to 75 years, depending on size. The picture here shows a fairy circle in its birth stage: the grass in the ring is dead but has not completely disappeared, and the circle is still flat rather than concave.*

Tschinkel's work does not answer the question of why fairy circles appear, but it helps to pin down the processes researchers will need to study to solve that mystery. “Every good piece of science starts with a good description of the phenomenon, and that’s what I’ve provided here,” he says.

Hypotheses for what causes these formations have focused on termite activity; presence of a toxin or absence of a nutrient in the soil; competition for water between plants; gas deposits; and even radioactivity, among others. So far, there is little evidence to support any of these theories, and data to discount some, but nothing is known conclusively.

Tschinkel says, “The man who founded the Namib Rand nature reserve [where the research took place] hopes that nobody ever solves the mystery of the fairy circles, and I can understand that.” Tschinkel assured him not to worry; science is still a long way from the answer.

—Evelyn Lamb

*Correction (7/2/12): These sentences were edited after posting. They originally stated the circles were typically mounds, rather than concave.

X

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Heteromeles 06:47 PM 6/27/12

    No one's proposing fungal growth? That forms everything from ringworm to fairy rings to even those "humongous fungus" Armillaria growths that look, yes, like rings.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jtdwyer in reply to Heteromeles 09:36 PM 6/27/12

    A seemingly very good candidate. However, it and all of the more questionable hypotheses mentioned in the article - termite activity; presence of toxins; absence of nutrients; water depletion; gas deposits; radioactivity - could be quickly tested in a well equipped laboratory supplied with a few soil samples. Curious that, instead, we're left puzzling over satellite images...

    Again, to someone whose only tool is a hammer, all problems appear to be nails.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. willfree 01:29 PM 6/28/12

    A quick web search reveals folks have taken samples and found nothing to explain the circles. I find the fairy hypothesis very doubtful, but it is a lovely mystery.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. jtdwyer in reply to willfree 03:41 PM 6/28/12

    I also later found elsewhere that a few circles were excavated in a search for termites. "Other experiments—adding essential nutrients such as zinc to the fairy circles or replacing the soil inside the circles with the soil from outside the circles—didn't cause the vegetation to grow back, suggesting the formations are not the result of a lack of nutrients."

    I never read elsewhere of any suggestion that they're due to extensive, deep fungal growths, which are fairly common. The termite excavations might have exposed the fungi if they'd known what to look for, but it wouldn't have looked like termites...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. harrytee 07:23 PM 6/29/12

    Maybe we ought to believe in fairies, or Tinker Bell is going to die....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. jtdwyer in reply to jtdwyer 08:20 PM 6/29/12

    A commentator on another blog referenced a very thorough research report of investigations into hydrocarbon and methane seeps as the cause of some of the 'fairy circles'. It seems very compelling to me. Seeing photos included in the report I was struck by how arid the land was - I suspect not a good environment for extensive, persistent underground fungal colonies.
    The hydrocarbon seep research report is available at http://www.namibrand.org/Library/Naude%20et%20al%20%20arid_%20environments-main.pdf

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X