Image Gallery | Space

Mars Polar Lander wreck may be hidden in plain sight

Enlarge NASA/JPL/University of Arizona MORE IMAGES

A Mars-bound lander that disappeared 10 years ago and has yet to be found may be hidden in an image such as this. Mission controllers lost contact with the Mars Polar Lander (MPL) in December 1999 as the probe descended toward the Martian surface. A review board later determined that a premature shutdown of the descent engines, while the lander was still 40 meters above the surface, probably caused the loss of MPL.

Since the accident, NASA orbiters such as the Mars Global Surveyor and the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter have searched the south polar region where MPL likely wrecked, in the hopes that photographic evidence from the crash site might provide some concrete answers about what happened. And in 2005 it appeared that NASA's Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft might have found MPL's remains. A report that year in Sky & Telescope presented images thought to be of the lander and its parachute, but later photographs showed the site to actually be barren.

This image, taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) on August 24, is a crop of a much larger photo of a southern swath near the MPL's presumed resting place. The images, from the MRO's powerful HiRISE camera, have a resolution of about 25 centimeters per pixel, but if MPL is in the target region it is well camouflaged, as it has yet to be found. Even with the help of HiRISE, the location of the Mars Polar Lander remains a mystery.

X

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. OaklandMike 06:18 PM 12/29/09

    While knowing where MPL went down may be marginally useful if images good enough to assist in the analysis of why it crashed can be obtained, that seems very unlikely. The success of the rovers and more recent probes shows that robotic craft can obtain highly significant science. The risk of catastrophic failure to human explorers from a MPL type event and the unquestioned success of robotic exploration should prove to us that it is a mistake to concentrate on human space exploration rather than robotic, at least in the near term.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. gar 12:35 AM 1/8/10

    the lack of daring and resolve expressed here is completely unfortunate. catastrophy is handmaiden to progress for humanity. our destiny is to penetrate the universe. of course, there will be a price. was it not ever so? robots will NOT do the job: were it not for human motives to explore and investigate first hand, there would be no science at all.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Johnay 03:36 PM 1/8/10

    Finding the wreckage will be good experience. If a manned mission loses communication before landing it would be good to be able to find them quickly enough to know where to send a rescue ship. (Maybe a lifeboat lander kept in orbit in case of such an occurrence.)

    If we want to recover live astronauts we better get the techniques down. Emergency locator beacons can fail too.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. gunondeer 12:11 PM 1/10/10

    I told yyou people years age that I had spotted adebries field North and West (about a 1000 yards) from that heart shaped featurenear the South Pole. To be exact, the point of impact is at 11:00 from the nothern point of the heart. I stumbled onto the field while measuring the heart featurs which by the way is symettrical. The point of impact point north by north west and is about 400-500 yards in a funnel shaped configuration and to reiterate, about 1000 yards from the northwestern point of the heart shaped feature at the south pole area.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. gunondeer 12:15 PM 1/10/10

    I told you guys about a debries field I stumbled onto years ago. I was measuring the heart shaped feature near the south pole when I noticed the debries field. It is located 1000 yards from the northernmost point of the heart. It runs in a funnel shape from the point of impact . Take a look!!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. botree in reply to gunondeer 03:42 PM 2/3/10

    where can I find the picture of the heart shape.

    Thanks...botree

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X