60-Second Health

Color-Coded Food Helps Consumers Make Healthful Choices

Six months after color coding its food choices as least, somewhat or most healthful, Massachusetts General Hospital saw its cafeteria users substantially decreased their least healthful food choices and increase the more healthful ones. Katherine Harmon reports














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

You might not know how many calories were in that sandwich. But if you got lunch at the Massachusetts General Hospital cafeteria, you could tell with one glance whether you'd made a healthful choice: offerings are color-coded.

Simply posting calories does not always get consumers to make healthier choices. So researchers tried something different.

Mass General’s cafeteria food and beverage options were classified as least, somewhat or most healthful with red, yellow or green labels. Green is healthiest. Researchers then tracked some 4,600 employees.

About six months after the changes were made, the purchases of "red" label food decreased by more than 15 percent, and "red" beverages dropped by 39 percent. "Green" food and drink purchases increased, according to the study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. [Douglas Levy et al., Food Choices of Minority and Low-Income Employees]

Making healthy food choices easier could especially help the poor the undereducated, the very populations most affected by the obesity epidemic. Mass General employees from those groups made the biggest improvements.

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]     


8 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. billsmith 01:56 AM 8/8/12

    Thank you for linking to the journal article!

    A few key quotes:


    "Importantly, switching to lower calorie beverages did not change the average amount of money that employees spent on beverages."



    "Although it was not possible to determine the exact mechanism of the labeling scheme’s effectiveness, two key features of the labels may have contributed.

    First, a traffic-light system is simple and does not have the numeracy demands of calorie counts.

    Second, it gives consumers information about what not to eat. Self-control is an inhibitory process, and may best be triggered by specific information on what actions to avoid."



    "employees from all racial/ethnic and job-type groups had similar improvements in purchasing after color-coded labeling followed by a choice architecture intervention were implemented, indicating that these interventions work equally well in populations at particular risk."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Newave 02:09 AM 8/8/12

    Why? Because Americans are too stupid to read labels or understand the decades of literature and media coverage and doctor discussions and...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. LordDraqo 12:14 PM 8/8/12

    I would not say that Americans are "too stupid" to read labels. I read labels all of the time. Media companies have gotten very good at obfuscating the contents in the way they are listed. Given a simple color-coding system that says "if these contents are in the food, it gets a red label," the leeway is taken away from the spin-doctors.

    Besides, if you are given the option between food with a red label, a yellow label, and a green label (assuming all of the food is the same price) I will wager that anyone would choose the food with the green label.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. sunnystrobe 10:13 AM 8/9/12

    I have developed a weightloss program in Australia that is based on simple natural colour coding; it needs no calorie counting, just colour combining, according to biology based, evolutionary anthropology. And it works.
    See Google under 'Colour Eating', and 'The Colorific Manifesto of Women's Waist & Disease Control' on:
    www.youthevity.com

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Fanandala 12:00 PM 8/9/12

    This is unfair to colour blind people, you are condemning me to an early demise. lol

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. sunnystrobe 06:48 AM 8/10/12

    To Fanandala: No, you're not doomed for an early demise!
    Just remember the following 7 medically proven, cheap & easily available superfoods and factor them into your daily eating scheme, preferably raw and crunchy:
    an apple, an orange, a corn cob, a carrot, a bell pepper, and a stick of celery! The medicine is inbuilt into their natural colour pigments.
    ( sounds simple, and works. This health info is based on recommendations by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.www.healthyactive.gov.au)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Stevens 06:46 PM 8/14/12

    A very successful version of these labels are available for at-home use. Easy Diet Labels. Online at www.easydietlabels.net and information at customerservice@easydietlabels.com. (Also at OrcasProductsGroup.com)

    They were written up in First Magazine about 2 years ago, and were endorsed by HungryGirl. I have used them and have lost sixty pounds. More importantly, for the first time in my life I am eating vegetables and am making healthy food choices.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. ASHIK 09:27 AM 8/15/12

    When i was a kid my moms(doctor) nurse from her hospital named aunt "Baby" used to bring me double coloured cakes.She had a child and loved those cakes.She has also saved me from a chasing bull by throwing stones at it like an angel.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Color-Coded Food Helps Consumers Make Healthful Choices

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X