60-Second Science

Nanotubes May Make Best Bulletproof Vest

A thin vest of tiny carbon nanotubes may have the potential to stop bullets without even the bruising left by today's vest technology. Cynthia Graber reports.














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Most bullet-proof materials that cops wear today work by spreading out the force of a bullet’s impact. But that can still cause bruises or even severe damage to internal organs. Now researchers at the University of Sydney are using nanotechnology to develop a vest that conjures up images of Superman—the bullets bounce away harmlessly. The researchers worked on the nanometer scale—one billionth of a meter—with carbon nanotubes.  A carbon nanotube is an atom thick-cylinder of graphite, like in pencil lead. They’re lightweight, extremely strong, and can absorb a great deal of energy.  But how do you optimize these properties to make a bulletproof vest?

Researchers tested how nanotubes of different sizes responded to impacts.  In place of bullets, they used tiny, super-hard diamonds.  Ironically, diamonds are just another arrangement of carbon atoms. Larger nanotubes worked best at deflecting the diamond projectiles. The nanotubes also quickly snapped back into position to deflect a second bullet that might hit the same spot. The study, published in the journal Nanotechnology, paves the way for a super-thin bulletproof vest of the future


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. MaterialGuy 10:41 AM 11/13/07

    The article assumes a nano-bullet hitting a nanotube acting in bending with end supports. It is hard to visualize how this is related to a macro-bullet hitting some form of macroscopic array of nanotubes connected together in some unspecified manner. While it is an idealization, it is not necessarily a useful one, and the widespread attention in the press probably reflects the inability of the media to understand the significance and insignificance of published computer analysis papers. Then, too, a good many analysts can't appreciate this difference either.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. harbor1314 04:23 PM 11/15/07

    It's a good news to polices who are quite in need of this bulletproof.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. solarskeptic 06:28 PM 10/27/09

    You still have the damage to the material behind (your body perhaps) the material.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Michael Cook 11:45 AM 10/31/09

    Actually I wear an old-tech Kevlar bullet-resistant vest every day at work. If you are shot in the chest with a high velocity rifle bullet such as a .308 weighing 170 grains and moving at 2750 fps, the bullet is coming through. Many vest designs incorporate a solid plate over the heart which on my earlier vests was steel, but soon will be a ceramic. These stop penetration better but because they sometimes fracture violent deformation of the vest can still kill by simply bruising the heart, which most frequently ruptures the aortic artery.

    Further, a major factor with vests has to be comfort. For both military and police the reality is that you are limited in hot weather by being inside what is essentially an efficient winter coat.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. jjas2264 06:16 PM 5/20/10

    Commenting on the comfort issue - nanotubes are also super efficient heat conductors - though I don't know how well this meshes with making bullet-resistant, lightweight fabric.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Nanotubes May Make Best Bulletproof Vest

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X