60-Second Science

Abstinence-Only Programs Fail

A British Medical Journal study finds that HIV-prevention abstinence-only programs don't work. Steve Mirsky reports.














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Abstinence-Only Programs Fail--August 3, 2007

Programs that encourage only abstinence from sex do not lower the risk of HIV infections in the United States.  That’s the conclusion of a review published by University of Oxford researchers in the August 4th issue of the British Medical Journal.

Currently, a third of all the HIV prevention funding under the US Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief goes to abstinence only programs.  Which limits funding available for other safer sex initiatives.  

The Oxford researchers reviewed 13 US-based trials that examined over 15,000 subjects.  The data suggest that abstinence only programs didn’t prevent sex or decrease frequency for those already having sex.  Nor did the programs lower the incidents of unprotected sex.  An accompanying editorial in the British Medical Journal notes that programs that promote condom use have been shown to lower the risk of HIV infection.  

The US Senate has already agreed to spend another $141 million on abstinence only programs.  Prediction: The new study will probably not change that appropriation.  Don’t expect programs based on ideology to be affected by scientific findings. 


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Abstinence-Only Programs Fail

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X