60-Second Science

Nectar-Feeding Bats Really Burn Energy

Nectar-feeding bats, which have to hover, go through sugar three times faster than even world-class athletes. Steve Mirsky reports.














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

Nectar-Feeding Bats Really Burn Energy--August 6, 2007

On the August 2nd episode, we talked about the amazingly high caloric needs of the cyclists competing in the Tour de France.  Now comes a study about a group of animal athletes that burn sugar three times faster than even world-class cyclists.  They’re nectar-feeding bats, and they go through their fuel faster than any other mammal on earth, according to researchers reporting in the journal Functional Ecology.  The bats hover and that kind of flight really burns energy.

The scientists fed long-tongued bats—they need the long tongues to get at the nectar in the flowers—they fed the bats sugar labeled with radioactive carbon and then measured the carbon that the bats exhaled.  They found that bats burned the sugars they ingested within minutes.  After less than a half hour they were fueling all of their metabolism with the new sugar.  The highest rates in humans are in athletes who can fuel about a third of their metabolisms from recently sucked down power drinks.  

Most mammals store energy and then access it, but the bat lifestyle required them to develop a just-in-time sugar delivery system.  


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Nectar-Feeding Bats Really Burn Energy

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X