60-Second Science

Baseball Luddites Need Video

Because umpires look for forensic evidence when available, their rejection of video is philosophically incoherent and harms baseball. Steve Mirsky reports.














Share on Tumblr

Listen to this Podcast

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Here’s why it’s time for instant replay in major league baseball. Don’t worry, this is a technology story. Four times within a week recently, what were clearly home runs according to the video were ruled otherwise by umpires. I happened to be watching two of the incidents as they happened. Baseball has long declined to use replay because officials insisted that the human factor of umpiring was part of the game. Even if it meant getting calls wrong, just as players make fielding errors. 

Here’s why that’s bunk. Umpires do in fact feel free to look for conventional evidence after the fact. They will consult with other umpires, comparing their differing eyewitness accounts. And they will employ forensic techniques to the ball itself. For example, they examine it for yellow paint that might have transferred to it when it hit a yellow wall over the outfield fence. These attempts to find and use evidence make the non-use of video replay a capricious rejection of technology. Fans shouldn’t feel when they root, root, root for the home team, if they don’t win it’s a shame.

—Steve Mirsky

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes


2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. JemSee 12:33 PM 4/6/09

    Video is not always conclusive. There will always be instances in which different camera angles will lead to different interpretations, or a single replay will be interpreted differently by two different viewers. Sport is a human activity, first and last; managers, players and umpires will make mistakes, and the game will continue. Technology is invaluable for improving the game, but only to the extent that it helps the humans who participate.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. JemSee 12:34 PM 4/6/09

    Video is not always conclusive. There will always be instances in which different camera angles will lead to different interpretations, or a single replay will be interpreted differently by two different viewers. Sport is a human activity, first and last; managers, players and umpires will make mistakes, and the game will continue. Technology is invaluable for improving the game, but only to the extent that it helps the humans who participate.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Baseball Luddites Need Video

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X