More 60-Second Mind
-
How to Enjoy Your Decision
5/22/13 -
Inside the Mind of a Psychopath
5/14/13
-
The Wisdom of Psychopaths
In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...
Read More »
[Below is the original script. Some textual variations may have been made during the recording of this podcast.]
Sex is back—with the movie Sex and the City opening this week in New York City to record-breaking crowds.
So, what better time to look at an interesting effect of sexual images.
Men who watch a video of bikini-clad women or fondle lingerie are apt to be more impatient to receive other rewarding stimuli, like money, candy or even soda—according to research published last week in the Journal of Consumer Behavior.
Three studies included a total of 348 men, from 17 to 39 years.
After seeing pics or videos of sexy women or handling a bra, men consistently preferred immediate gratification: They chose to receive a small sum of money right away, over receiving a large sum later.
Previous studies show that erotic stimuli tap into the same brain circuits as money and drug rewards do. This research further supports the idea that one stimuli, sexy images, can leak into a craving for different stimuli, like money—at least in half the human race.
No similar effects reported for women…yet.
I mean Sex and the City's Samantha starts stuffing her face with guacamole after ogling a sexy male neighbor in the shower.
Then again, Samantha is considered the most masculine of the four female characters….
60-Second Psych is a weekly podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes



Listen to this Podcast
See what we're tweeting about



2 Comments
Add CommentYou watch too much entertainment television.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI wonder if the sole purpose of the original posting is to plug a commercial video product?
Sorry, but this is way below the bar for serious science.
It is right up at the fore of serious advertising.
Let the buyer beware.
SCIAM like all other magazines exists to make a profit, mostly via advertising revenue.
In any case, you are sure to see much more of it.
Science can be entertaining, but entertainment is not science.
I absolutely agree with Bradley. What editor let this get out of the writing room? Psychology being such a new science means it has to work harder to establish itself, and misogyny and advertising aren't helping.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this